SEC asks Steve Jobs for deposition in Apple shares case
By Reuters and Simon Aughton,
Steve Jobs, the chief executive of Apple has been asked by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to give a deposition in a lawsuit against the company's former general counsel.
According to a person familiar with the matter, the Securities and Exchange Commission subpoenaed Jobs for its case against former Apple general counsel Nancy Heinen, who was charged on 24 April for backdating option grants to Jobs and other executives.
Jobs was among a number of Apple executives who were expected to give depositions in connection with the suit, the source said, adding: "We are at beginning of that process."
Apple and the SEC declined comment. A lawyer for Jobs could not be reached for comment.
According to a document filed in a California court on 31 August, Heinen is seeking 45 depositions for the case, while the SEC is looking to limit the number to 12 per party.
SEC lawyers have accused Heinen and former Apple chief financial officer Fred Anderson of backdating more than $20 million (£10 million) in stock options in 2001 for Jobs, themselves and other executives.
Anderson in April said he had been told by Jobs that Apple's board had given its approval in the handling of the backdated stock options.
The SEC did not pursue charges against Anderson after he agreed, without admitting or denying the allegations, to pay $3.5 million (£1.75 million) in fines and disgorgement of profit. Heinen's attorney, Miles Ehrlich, said that she is "unimpeachable" and everything she did was approved by Apple's board.
The SEC said in April that it would not pursue enforcement action against Apple, but that the decision did not bar further civil claims against other Apple executives. Apple's own internal investigation, led by board member and former US vice president Al Gore, exonerated Jobs of any misconduct while acknowledging that errors had been made.
Between 1997 and 2002 stock option grants to some executives were backdated to take advantage of a lower share price. Though this in itself was not illegal at the time, failing to include it in the company accounts was. Jobs has long since returned those options he received and insisted he did not "appreciate the accounting implications".
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking Analysis & Insight
Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
Inside the Enterprise: The Government has warned of disruption, and the Civil Service is practising working from home. Could IT yet save businesses from chaos on an Olympian scale?
- Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
- It's not about the browser, stupid!
- The Great British network squeeze
- New year: new suppliers
- Top 10 tech winners and losers of 2011
- 2011: The year in news
- UK rural broadband: too little, and too late
- HP PCs back on the menu with Dellish plans
- Top 10 social networking tips for enterprise - part one
Latest Networking Reviews
Swyx SwyxExpress X20 review
Rating: ![]()
- Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold Premium 15
- ForeScout Technologies CounterACT 6.3.4
- ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- TITUS Aware for Microsoft Outlook review
- Windows Phone 7 Mango review: First Look
- Dartware InterMapper review
- Kemp Technologies LoadMaster 3600 review
- Sangfor WANACC M5500 review
- Office 365 review: First look
advertisement
Most popular
- Ubuntu vs. Windows 7 on the business desktop
- York researchers heat storage to speed up data
- OneNote hits Google?s Android
- O2 trials Olympic-scale remote working
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Lenovo beats expectations again
- BlackBerry Bold 9790 review
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- Google to promise fairness after Motorola buy
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.



