ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    Intel-AMD court battle delayed until 2010

AMD looking to prove Intel gave computer makers and retail outlets illegal discounts.

By Reuters, 6 Jun 2008 at 10:20

A long-running legal battle between AMD and Intel has seen its trial date delayed until 2010, both chip firms have said.

In the lawsuit originally filed in 2005, AMD accused Intel of giving computer makers illegal discounts and retaliating against manufacturers who used AMD chips or stores that gave significant shelf space to computers with AMD chips.

Intel has denied any wrongdoing.

The two sides will split 250 days to depose witnesses, with AMD getting slightly more than Intel, said AMD attorney Chuck Diamond and Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy, both of whom were at a hearing at the US District Court for the District of Delaware in Wilmington.

The trial had been set for April 2009, but was pushed back to 20 February 2010, said Diamond.

AMD had asked the court for 486 depositions in hopes of proving that Intel broke the law in competing with AMD. Intel sought to limit each company to 75 depositions.

Intel will also be required to produce Edward Ho, an Intel employee in China, for a deposition, said Diamond and Mulloy by telephone. AMD hopes that Ho's testimony will help them prove their case.

Also yesterday, the Korea Fair Trade Commission in Seoul said Intel abused its dominant position in the local market and ordered a fine of $25.6 million (£13 millioin). Intel said it would almost certainly appeal

The US Federal Trade Commission has an informal probe underway into whether Intel abused its dominant position, while the New York state attorney general opened a formal probe in January.

Last July, the European Commission in Brussels charged Intel with selling chips below cost and offering customers huge rebates in an illegal attempt to drive AMD out of the market.

In Japan, the Fair Trade Commission concluded in 2005 that Intel violated the antimonopoly act. Intel disagreed with the findings but accepted the commission's recommendation, a move that avoided a trial.

Email to a friend

Print this page

Social Bookmark this article: What is this?

Be the first to comment on this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

advertisement

    Latest Server Reviews

Miniframe SoftXpand

Rating: 5

It’s cheap, it’s green, but is it legal? Miniframe's unique approach to thin clients lets multiple users access a single Windows PC, but check your licences before you drive.

Read more

 
advertisement

    Latest News Videos in Server

Video: Steve Murphy, Hitachi Data Systems

Play Video: Steve Murphy, Hitachi Data Systems   Play

IT PRO speaks to Steve Murphy, UK Managing Director of storage technology specialist Hitachi Data Systems.

 

    White papers

Want more background on today's hottest IT trends?

Visit IT PRO's white paper library for more on virtualisation, encryption and other topics.

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free white papers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Advertisement