ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    Oracle destroyed email evidence in lawsuit

An American judge has ruled that emails from Oracle's CEO sought as evidence in a lawsuit were destroyed by the software maker.

By Jim Finkle, Reuters, 4 Sep 2008 at 10:33

An American judge has ruled that Oracle destroyed - or failed to preserve - email files from chief executive Larry Ellison's which were sought as evidence in a class-action lawsuit filed in 2001 against the software maker.

The suit seeks damages on behalf of Oracle shareholders who held the stock when it fell after the company reported disappointing results in 2001.

The lawsuit claims Ellison and other executives made false statements about the company's financial condition as well as the functionality of its Oracle 11i suite of business management software.

US District Judge Susan Illston also ruled that Oracle improperly failed to produce tapes and transcripts from interviews that a journalist conducted with Ellison in 2001 and 2002 as he gathered material to write "Softwar," a biography of the company's founder.

She said the tapes and transcripts were held by the author, Matthew Symonds, who had them destroyed in late 2006 or early 2007.

Illston said Oracle should have figured out a way to comply with the order to produce the information, which was issued in late 2006, saying that Ellison knew of the litigation at the time most of the interviews were conducted. She said that he shared intellectual property rights to the materials with Symonds.

"It is appropriate to infer that the emails and software materials would demonstrate Ellison's knowledge of, among other things, problems with Suite 11i, the effects of the economy on Oracle's business and problems with defendants' forecasting model," Illston said in an order.

Illston said she would instruct jurors to make such an inference when they consider the case during a trial scheduled to begin on March 30.

Oracle has asked the court to throw out the case prior to the start of the trial. The plaintiffs have asked Illston to rule on some key claims.

In her ruling, Illston asked both sides to revise and submit their requests for summary judgement prior to the start of the trial, specifying how her ruling on the evidence spoilage should impact her decision on those matters.

Oracle spokeswoman Deborah Hellinger declined comment.

Email to a friend

Print this page

Social Bookmark this article: What is this?

Be the first to comment on this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

advertisement

    Latest Client Features

Netbooks vs. Smartphones: Making business mobile

What we traditionally think of as a smartphone is changing, as data is overtaking voice in terms of use. However, netbooks are beginning to become more and more pocketable – but which is better for someone who wants an office on the move?

Read more

 

    Latest Client Reviews

Lexmark X560n

Rating: 5

This well featured multifunction printer is designed to be the office workhorse. Does it meet with Simon Williams' approval? Read on to find out.

Read more

 
advertisement

    Latest News Videos in Client

Video: HTC Touch Pro review

Play Video: HTC  Touch Pro review   Play

Can HTC's Touch Pro go one better than the Touch Diamond? Check out our video review to find out.

 

    White papers

Want more background on today's hottest IT trends?

Visit IT PRO's white paper library for more on virtualisation, encryption and other topics.

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free white papers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Advertisement