One in four servers unpatched for Kaminsky flaw
By Asavin Wattanajantra,
Research has revealed that one in four servers is unpatched for the Kaminsky vulnerability.
This was according to an Infoblox survey of Domain Name System (DNS) servers, based on a survey of IPv4 address space sampling nearly 80 million addresses.
One in four servers did not perform source port randomisation, the ‘patch’ for the Kaminsky flaw. This removes the predictable nature of DNS source ports and replaces it with a randomised selection technique.
The patch was a multi-vendor effort which gave companies like Cisco and Microsoft the chance to fix the problem before attack code was circulated online.
It also required administrators to upgrade their name servers, but it was claimed that 40 per cent had not been upgraded. The research also revealed that only .002 per cent of DNS zones tested supported DNSSEC.
This left servers accepting open recursive queries from any inquirer, which were vulnerable to cache poisoning and Distributed Denial of Service attacks.
Cricket Liu, vice president of architecture at Infoblox, said that it was surprising that many organisations were still leaving themselves open to attack considering the awareness of the Kaminsky vulnerability.
He said: “Even if an enterprise has gone to the trouble of patching against the Kaminsky vulnerability, there are many other aspects of configuration, like recursion and open zone transfers that should also be secured.
“If not, organisations are essentially locking their door to their house, but leaving the windows wide open.”
DNS servers are network infrastructure which maps domain names to IP addresses. Domain name resolution conducted by the servers is needed to perform any internet-related request.
The survey did reveal a bit off good news with the usage of ‘unsecure’ Microsoft DNS servers connected to the internet disappearing rapidly. Only 0.17 per cent of the addresses relied on it.
An IT PRO history of the Kaminsky flaw is available here.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
Do British police get cyber security?
Davey Winder listens to telephone conversations between the FBI and the Metropolitan Police, courtesy of Anonymous, and isn't impressed.
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- Would you employ a hacker or malware writer?
- Q&A: Raj Samani, CTO McAfee
- Erase and rewind: the EU and privacy
- My email address is [CENSORED]
- Is there such a thing as a secure tablet?
- 2011: The year in news
- BYOD: Old or new, good or bad?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Ubuntu vs. Windows 7 on the business desktop
- York researchers heat storage to speed up data
- OneNote hits Google?s Android
- O2 trials Olympic-scale remote working
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Lenovo beats expectations again
- BlackBerry Bold 9790 review
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- Google to promise fairness after Motorola buy
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





