ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    US ISP’s set to battle net neutrality bill

Larger ISPs will push against proposed neutrality bill, claiming current regulation is sufficient.

By Kim Dixon, Reuters, 14 Nov 2008 at 08:48

ISP’s in the US are set to have a fight on their hands as a senator tries to push through so called, 'net neutrality’ legislation.

Senator Byron Dorgan, a North Dakota Democrat, wants to prevent ISP’s from blocking and traffic shaping internet content, claiming that current internet regulation is not sufficient, one of his aids said on Thursday.

"We feel that legislation is definitely necessary," said Frannie Wellings, telecom counsel to Dorgan, speaking at a University of Nebraska law school event on changes in telecom law after the election of Democrat Barack Obama.

Dorgan has been influential on the issue, and will be among the highest ranking Democrats on the Senate's Commerce Committee when it reconvenes in January.

The net neutrality fight pits internet service providers (ISPs), such as AT&T against content companies like Google and Microsoft.

The larger ISPs say they need to manage the ever-growing traffic on their networks without government interference.

Content companies say the ISPs hold too power much to block or slow down traffic requiring more bandwidth, such as movie downloads, or certain content altogether.

President-elect Barack Obama supports net neutrality legislation. The election of Obama and more Democrats who back the concept adds momentum to the cause, Wellings said.

A recent Federal Communications Commission (FCC) decision ordering Comcast to stop impeding the sharing of certain content between users proves regulators already have the authority, an AT&T official said.

"The current principles already deal with unreasonable discrimination," said Jim Cicconi, AT&T executive vice president for regulatory affairs, pointing to the Comcast case.

The public would not pay for its internet services if AT&T discriminated against content, he added. "We'd be shooting ourselves in the foot."

Comcast is suing the FCC over the issue, and much depends on the outcome of that case, experts said. If the court sides with Comcast, legislation will become much more likely.

"The telephone and cable companies say trust them," said Markham Erickson, director of the Open Internet Coalition, a trade group that lobbies for net neutrality, with members such as Google and eBay. "We will trust but verify, " he added.

Email to a friend

Print this page

< Previous   Networking : News Next >

1 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

Net Neutrality

Net Neutrality is one thing the FCC is absolutely pushing for. Net neutrality is basically a method to get a lot more access to the internet to more Americans at an easily affordable rate by opening it up for every person. The money advances that individuals take out to pay for their web fees are often so that they can get higher speeds of internet. I read this here: <a title="The FCC is attempting to enforce net neutrality." href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2010/06/18/fcc-net-neutrality-third-way/">FCC proposes net neutrality Third Way</a>Giving people cheaper access to the internet may actually backfire and hurt the world wide web. I do not know if this is good or bad, but giving more access to the internet will in turn cause more traffic online also.

By AngelicaX on Tuesday Jun 22

1 people out of 1 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

 Sponsored Links

advertisement
advertisement

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement