Facebook spammer ordered to pay millions in damages
By Asavin Wattanajantra,
A Facebook spammer has been ordered to pay $873 million (£579 million) in damages for sending users millions of unwanted messages.
Director of security Max Kelly revealed on the Facebook blog that after a San Jose court proceeding lasting four months, a judge awarded the damages against Adam Guerbuez and Atlantis Blue Capital.
It was the largest award made to date under the ‘Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act’ (CAN-SPAM). According to reports, Guerbuez tricked users into revealing passwords and usernames, using the information to gain access to their personal profiles.
Facebook alleged that he sent out more than four million messages. Kelly said that it was unlikely that Guerbuez and Atlantis Blue Capital could ever honour the judgement and pay the fine, but that the award acted as a deterrent to anybody who abused Facebook and its users.
Kelly said: “The judgement is a result of the tireless effort of our security experts, legal team and the other significant resources we’ve devoted to finding, exposing and prosecuting the sources of spam attacks.
“These efforts complement the sophisticated technical systems we continue to develop to limit the impact of these attacks or block them together.
Carole Theriault of Sophos warned that spam via social networks like Facebook was only possible about protecting their usernames and passwords. Phishing attacks which had previously been largely targeted at online bank customers were now being targeted at the users of these websites.
She said: “Hackers are keen to steal the usernames and passwords of Facebook users as it makes it easier for them to spam out convincing messages to a victim’s circle of friends.
“You should not only choose a complex hard-to-guess password for these sites, but also defend your computer with up-to-date anti-virus software and security patches.”
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
Davey Winder questions what data was stolen from VeriSign and wonders why the company hasn't been more forthcoming.
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- Would you employ a hacker or malware writer?
- Q&A: Raj Samani, CTO McAfee
- Erase and rewind: the EU and privacy
- My email address is [CENSORED]
- Is there such a thing as a secure tablet?
- 2011: The year in news
- BYOD: Old or new, good or bad?
- Are the cookie laws crumbling already?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Google releases Chrome for Android beta
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- OneNote hits Google?s Android
- BlackBerry Bold 9790 review
- Google sends in Bouncer to sort out malicious apps
- Ubuntu vs. Windows 7 on the business desktop
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7
- ACTA: the basics, the controversies, and the future
- BT considering Ofcom price cap appeal
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





