Millions of jobseeker details stolen in Monster hack
By Asavin Wattanajantra,
Job recruitment website Monster has been hacked, with details from the 4.5 million users of Monster.co.uk stolen.
Contact and account details were lost, including user IDs, passwords, email addresses, names, phone numbers, and basic demographic data. Fortunately, the breach did not include sensitive details like social security numbers or personal financial data.
Upon learning of the theft, Monster initiated an investigation and took active steps to correct the problem with the help of law enforcement. So far, the company claimed that it has not seen any misuse of the stolen information.
However, Monster users may soon be required to change their passwords upon logging onto the site, and it was also recommended that they proactively changed it in the meantime.
Monster decided not to send email notifications to avoid the risk that the messages would be used a template for phishing emails targeting job seekers. It warned users not to accept unsolicited emails asking for a Monster username and password.
Security experts have said that users should be aware that the information taken from Monster alone was not enough to attack bank accounts, but that it was nevertheless a very worrying breach of security.
Jay Heiser, Gartner research vice president, said: “It is the case that the criminal community is hoovering up large amounts of personal info and correlating it, functioning as some sort of underground information bureau."
He added: “The fact that most people do use the same password on multiple sites means it is possible for that password information from Monster to be available to attackers, along with information from other sources, to attack bank accounts."
He also said that users should never assume that a Software as a Service (SaaS) offering was safe, unless they were given evidence that it was. He said that consumers had no way of knowing how safe a site was, and shouldn’t put anything on it that would harm them if it was stolen.
Heiser also said that this should serve as a warning to businesses. He said: “If what you do involves information that you can’t afford to lose, or you don’t want stolen, then you need to be given evidence by the service provider that they are taking security into account.”
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
Striving to solve the security skills crisis
The Cyber Security Challenge is doing a fine job, but flat registration growth and weak Government funding are cause for concern, Tom Brewster discovers.
- Would you employ a hacker or malware writer?
- Q&A: Raj Samani, CTO McAfee
- Erase and rewind: the EU and privacy
- My email address is [CENSORED]
- Is there such a thing as a secure tablet?
- 2011: The year in news
- BYOD: Old or new, good or bad?
- Are the cookie laws crumbling already?
- Sticking security where the sun don't shine
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Virgin remains on top in broadband speed race
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- MPs call for infection detection database
- A data shock warning for Orange customers
- What can Intel bring to the smartphone market?
- T-Mobile announces 'UK's first' fully unlimited deals
- Nokia Lumia 710 review
- Cisco launches turbo-powered wireless access point
- Facebook unveils $10bn IPO plans
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.
![My email address is [CENSORED]](http://cdn.itpro.co.uk/images/front_picture_library_IT_Pro/dir_227/it_photo_113980_36.jpg)





Gary Gemmell
Worse than it sounds as many people use the same usernames and passwords in their internet banking and other financial sites. Alos 4.5 million not billion as on the content page - gave me quite a shock that did!!!
By gazomen on Tuesday Feb 3
Security in Online Recruitment
This is precisely why high-value job-seekers in management, finance, IT, etc., are increasingly going to high-end niche sites like http://www.qualifind.co.uk where security is much more comprehensive. These kind of sites, as a rule, are not only built from highly secure non-mainstream technologies, but allow candidates full control over their data, including full irrevocable delete.
By davidvr on Monday Jun 21