ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    Should you skip Vista and wait for Windows 7?

Some companies are considering skipping Microsoft's current operating system, Vista, in favour of waiting for the already more popular Windows 7 - but is that a wise move?

By Nicole Kobie, 30 Jan 2009 at 17:13

It’s been a little over two years since Microsoft’s Vista operating system (OS) was released to the corporate world, followed by a retail release two years ago this weekend.

With a favourably-reviewed Windows 7 nearing release, some IT departments are wondering if it’s worth waiting for the new kid and skipping over Vista entirely – and some analysts are suggesting that’s already happening.

Will firms ignore Vista?

Last year, Gartner surveyed attendees one of its symposiums, finding 30 per cent of the firms represented there planned to skip Vista entirely, while another 15 per cent had no plans as of then to migrate to the OS. “And that was at the very beginning of the economic crisis,” said Gartner analyst Neil MacDonald. “Those numbers are getting worse.”

Gartner’s numbers suggest Vista has been adopted by fewer than six per cent of organisations at the end of last year. “It’s just horrible results for a Microsoft OS,” MacDonald said. “It’s going to go down with Windows ME as one of Microsoft’s worst releases ever.”

Microsoft would like to politely disagree. John Curran, the head of its Windows Client arm, said that between 8.5 per cent and 10 per cent of businesses have switched to Vista across industry, compared to the 6.6 per cent which moved to XP two years after its release. “It’s still tracking ahead of XP deployment,” Curran told IT PRO.

Time to migrate?

But with Windows 7 expected to be released by the end of this year, and economic turmoil shrinking budgets, those migration numbers might not improve.

Dale Vile, an analyst at Freeform Dynamics, said his company has no evidence that firms are holding out for Windows 7 – but agreed it does seem that way. “We have no hard research on this, it’s anecdotal – people are looking at Windows 7 coming along,” he said. “They’re not put off it [Vista], but certainly reviewing whether they should hold off or not.”

Rather unsurprisingly, Microsoft advises not to linger. The time to upgrade is now, and waiting will only make it more difficult in the long run, said Microsoft's Curran, adding that “the path to Windows 7 is Vista.”

But even Curran agreed that some companies will skip Vista entirely. “Companies are always going too go through different paths in adoption,” Curran agreed. “For some, it will make sense to go from XP to Windows 7… but some will go to Windows Vista first.”

Because Windows 7 and Vista share a kernel, switching between the two shouldn’t be difficult – but then neither should switching from XP to Windows 7. “In terms of application compatibility and remediation, moving from XP to Vista, or XP to Windows 7, is a comparable move… but Vista to 7 is much less complicated,” Curran said, adding that any hardware bought for Vista will also suit Windows 7.

Hardware could indeed be key, said Gartner’s MacDonald. “In the current economic crisis, one area people are going to look to save money is hardware,” he said, suggesting companies might hold off on a hardware refresh and stick with lower spec computers running XP, rather than upgrade to processor-hungry Vista. “XP is a pretty darn good OS, so there’s no imminent reason to switch.”

Email to a friend

Print this page

Previous
1 2
< Previous   Desktop Software : News Next >

2 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

The Likely Answer is - Yes Skip

As an experienced Project Manager on Roll Outs and hardware 'refresh', the reality of most situations is that a decision to "skip Vista" is not quite as simple as that, profitability and available budget will be more important. There are also two other things to consider: The hardware, I'm running a 64 bit version of the 7 Beta on is over 3 years old, it runs sweetly, Vista didn't. It is true that any Vista drivers seem to run on 7 whereas XP drivers are more hit and miss unless they have done a Vista version. But there is one other thing which I consider more important, user training. There is a difference in the "user approach" between Vista and 7 so switching to Vista just to get your hardware estate up to speed, then doing what maybe a "free upgrade" to 7, makes little commercial sense. Finally, if you did go Vista today, you are realistically buying into Vista for 3-5 years and much as I like Vista now they have killed off most of the problems, personally I will wait on 7, it looks like a good product and what Vista should have been.

By Bikey2 on Tuesday Feb 3

9 people out of 10 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Operating system is least important

For most Business, the flagship Aero Glass grapics (not in Vista basic) are of no importance, the under the hood security improvements such as increasing the strength of DEP by address space randomization, are of some importance. <P> The key thing, is "are your applications supported", from older applications which may have issues with upgrading, to new or upgraded applications which may not be compatible with older operating systems. <P> One key factor, if the door remains open, however slightly, to deploying new XP installations into the existing pool, rather than the awkward prospect of mixing Vista and XP or upgrading all to Vista, then staying put is the likely choice. <P> Only a few versions of Windows have shown real staying power. <BR>1. Windows 3.11/WfWG 3.11, the pinnacle of 3.x development and a major sticking point against Windows 95 <BR>2. Windows 98SE - the peak of the 9X line (WIndows ME broke too many things and added too little) <BR>3. Windows XP - brought 9x and NT streams together, and they actually made a damn good job of it, instead of turning out another Windows ME level botch job. <P> Other versions may have their adherents, some would rate Windows 2000 superior to XP, while most agree on the awfulness of 3.0 (fragile), 95 (first attempt at 32 bit) and Windows ME (98 third edition gone wrong).

By Ip_nonsense574f8 on Tuesday Feb 3

4 people out of 5 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

    You may also like...

 Sponsored Links

advertisement

    You may also like...

advertisement

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement