ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    Will Mac OS ever be the business platform of choice?

Windows is apparently in decline, and Mac OS is growing. Does that mean that it’s primed for the business market?

By Simon Brew, 9 Mar 2009 at 15:59

Believe the statistics, and Microsoft Windows – in its many guises – is an operating system in decline. Recent numbers have suggested that, for the first time in well over a decade, it has less than 90 per cent of the total operating system market, and its chief competitor isn’t the one that’s been garnering the majority of the headlines.

For all the discussion of the merits of Linux, it still accounts for less than one per cent of all operating system use, a bewildering number given the column inches it attracts and the myriad of alternatives that are available. Yet its market share has remained minimal for some time, and there’s no clear breakthrough on the horizon.

Instead, though, it’s Mac OS that’s gradually growing in popularity.

According to the numbers for January 2009, as released by Net Applications, the market share of Mac OS was up to 9.9 per cent (admittedly this statistic is centred around internet-connected machines).

Given that this is fuelled by a few months now of consecutive growth, it’s expected that it’ll be breaking the 10 per cent mark imminently. Of course, much of this is inevitably down to the gradual increase in market share of the Apple Macintosh format itself. But it nonetheless begs the question: can Apple’s operating system have a future of as a business desktop?

Designer

For the design and creative industries, the answer right now – as it has been for many years – is a big, fat yes. These are the areas of business where Apple has continually held a strong foothold, even while the Macintosh format itself was floundering and looked rudderless.

No matter how much PC manufacturers and software producers have targeted these professional industries, they’ve nonetheless steadfastly remained the foundation on which Apple continues to build its Macintosh business.

And thus, when Apple’s credibility and popularity bounced back – fuelled initially by the iMac and then subsequently the likes of the iPod – it did so with a small but loyal comfort blanket already in place.

Since the late 90s, Apple has gradually grown its market share, and the emergence of Apple stores, and Intel-powered Macintoshes, has continued that trend.

And yet you walk around the vast bulk of non-creative industries, and there’s barely a Macintosh to be found, with Windows-laden PCs still the mainstay of the majority of businesses.

Costly

Given the general level of user satisfaction with an Apple machine on their desk, why is this so?

Put simply, cost. It’s little secret that many users find the Apple interface easy to use and interact with, and a good number will likely prefer it to the Windows alternative were they given the choice. But they never will be. For while a Windows PC can be bought and installed for less than £300 a seat (before you get to office and security software costs), the cheapest Mac – currently a Mac Mini – comes in at nearly £100 more.

Even before businesses were hit by the state of the world financial market, that’s a hefty premium to pay for a tool to do simply office work, and understandably, the vast majority opt for the cost effectiveness of a PC, whether they have format loyalty or not. Thus, the Mac operating system never gets much of a look in for the mundane, day-to-day chores that the PC is simply cheaper at doing.

Previous
1 2

Email to a friend

Print this page

Macs : Analysis & Insight Next >

5 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

You pays your money. . . .

It amazes me, given that technology directly affects the productivity of staff on a daily basis, and staff are paid 5 digit sums per year, how often decisions are made on the basis of saving 3 digit sums - generally speaking because they are seen as different budgets. Although it must be said that for many businesses today, their users need little more than a web browser, Word and Excel - and even the last two might be optional.

By JulesLt on Friday Mar 27

1 people out of 1 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Windows on a Mac?

If you love a particular Windows-only software program, then it IS possible to run it on a Mac, using either BootCamp or Parallels, BUT lord help you if you develop a problem with that combination. Here's the scene, calling Windows support: Caller: I'm having problems running Windows on my computer. Tech: No problem. Which machine are you using? Caller: An iMac Intel. Support tech: Sorry, we don't support Windows on a Mac. Call Apple. Scenario 2: Calling Mac Tech Support - Caller: I need help running Windows on my Mac. Tech Support: We don't support Windows. Caller: But you made it possible for me to install Windows on my Mac. Tech Suuport: Yes, that's true. But we don't do Windows support here. Try Microsoft.

By donlevy on Wednesday Apr 15

0 people out of 0 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Cost comparisons between Mac and PC are misleading

The modest disparity in purchase price between Macs and PCs is more than handsomely offset by many other savings: 1. Macs historically have a significantly longer useful lifespan than Windows boxes - typically several years worth. 2. The product consistency results in great savings, in terms of the ease of troubleshooting, upgrading, and predicting the appropriateness and likely success of various upgrades, add-ons, software installation, and ease of use. Given the vast diversity of quality and configurations that exists on the PC side, servicing, when needed, can be a nightmare for both the tech and the owner. A difference of a hundred dollars or even a hundred pounds is trivial when compared to the added cost AFTER the product is purchased and in comparing the useful lifetime of the Mac vs. the Windows PC. and then, there's that ease of use thing, as well as the elegance (technical elegance) of the Mac vs. the PC. The first commenter here, JulesLT, made that point pretty effectively.

By donlevy on Wednesday Apr 15

0 people out of 0 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Look at the Total cost of Ownership

donlevy almost makes the point. The premium for Macs is trivial compared the support costs not incurred, despite their constantly changing processors. One of our Macs is a 17 year old 68040 & still gives no trouble.

By KenBaldry on Friday Aug 7

0 people out of 0 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Business Needs Are Different...

Business purchasers aren't looking for the best computing experience. They are looking for something cheap that does the job. Large businesses purchase fleets of POS Chryslers or Fords for their employees to drive. These cars have plastic floor-mats instead of carpeting, and gutless engines. You would be embarrassed to purchase one of these cars for yourself. But businesses purchase them in droves because they do the job and are cheap. When given a choice, people who can afford it purchase Honda's, or Lexuses or BMW's. It's the same with PC's. Cheap Windows boxes get the job done. Many folks purchase Macintoshes for their use at home. Apple doesn't sell low-end computers. It would tarnish their image, the same way that BMW doesn't compete with Chevy. As Mac's become more popular for home use, I expect more and more executives that can dicatate to their IT departments to use Macs at work, but by and large the business market will always belong to Windows.

By Randy_Singer on Saturday Aug 8

1 people out of 1 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

    You may also like...

 Sponsored Links

advertisement

    You may also like...

advertisement
Sponsored Links
Advertisement