Will Mac OS ever be the business platform of choice?
By Simon Brew,
Apple, however, doesn’t seem to be particularly bothered. It’s played quite cleverly over the years on Apple being an alternative, a niche format, and getting a higher price per unit from a smaller audience is a business model that is serving the firm well. It’s clearly working, given the many billions of dollars that Apple has sitting in the bank.
Apple shows little intention of attempting to break down the mass market business sector, either. This is a pity: like it or lump it, but Mac OS would bring a variety and choice to the sector, and in terms of sheer usability, it’s likely to earn itself friends.
Yet to try and compete with the PC in the average office would mean a substantial shift in the Apple business model, one the firm has understandable reluctance at embarking upon. Simply, the manner of the PC marketplace, with multiple manufacturers competing on a cutthroat level with one another, makes it a brutal environment where cost is concerned.
For Apple to begin to attack that sector, would immediately see it sacrificing its premium brand identity, a gamble that could have far-reaching ramifications for the company.
Hackintosh?
But there is, of course, another option. And that’s for Apple to release a version of the Mac operating system for PCs. The internet is awash with stories of people who have attempted to do this with existing software, and some have enjoyed success, too. That’s unsurprising given the Intel architecture that Apple Macintoshes are running on, which could look equally at home in the belly of a PC.
Yet Apple is keen to control its market space, and has shown no interest – quite the contrary – in releasing its operating system for a platform other than the Macintosh. Currently it’s embroiled in a legal battle with Psystar over so-called Hackintoshes, that have seen the Apple operating system installed onto non-Apple hardware.
Granted, the legal process takes in more than just the operating system, but Apple has made its displeasure clear over a third party company installing the Mac OS operating system onto its hardware. The legal case is going, and may be for some time yet, so it remains unclear whether Psystar will unlock the ability to install Mac OS onto its machines long term. But given the manner and ferocity in which Apple is fighting the case, this will run and run.
And that alone gives a clear indication that the business desktop space is not a place that Apple is keen to reside. It’s probably, right now, a wise strategy, but it does nonetheless limit just how far the Mac OS market share is likely to grow.
With Windows 7 set for release later this year (or so it seems), Microsoft’s flagship product is set to get a jolt in the arm that could see Apple’s market share retreat back to a level a good deal below 10 per cent.
Right now, of course, the irony is that Apple makes it possible to run Windows on a Mac using its Boot Camp software. But its current strategy of producing a premium product with the price to match means that, short of a court ruling or two going against it, Apple won’t be competing in the mass market business space for a very long time.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Macs News
Apple OS X users warned of botnet risk
Russian anti-virus vendor claims over half a million Apple devices could be infected with botnet.
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information





You pays your money. . . .
It amazes me, given that technology directly affects the productivity of staff on a daily basis, and staff are paid 5 digit sums per year, how often decisions are made on the basis of saving 3 digit sums - generally speaking because they are seen as different budgets.
Although it must be said that for many businesses today, their users need little more than a web browser, Word and Excel - and even the last two might be optional.
By JulesLt on Friday Mar 27
Windows on a Mac?
If you love a particular Windows-only software program, then it IS possible to run it on a Mac, using either BootCamp or Parallels, BUT lord help you if you develop a problem with that combination. Here's the scene, calling Windows support:
Caller: I'm having problems running Windows on my computer.
Tech: No problem. Which machine are you using?
Caller: An iMac Intel.
Support tech: Sorry, we don't support Windows on a Mac. Call Apple.
Scenario 2:
Calling Mac Tech Support -
Caller: I need help running Windows on my Mac.
Tech Support: We don't support Windows.
Caller: But you made it possible for me to install Windows on my Mac.
Tech Suuport: Yes, that's true. But we don't do Windows support here. Try Microsoft.
By donlevy on Wednesday Apr 15
Cost comparisons between Mac and PC are misleading
The modest disparity in purchase price between Macs and PCs is more than handsomely offset by many other savings:
1. Macs historically have a significantly longer useful lifespan than Windows boxes - typically several years worth.
2. The product consistency results in great savings, in terms of the ease of troubleshooting, upgrading, and predicting the appropriateness and likely success of various upgrades, add-ons, software installation, and ease of use.
Given the vast diversity of quality and configurations that exists on the PC side, servicing, when needed, can be a nightmare for both the tech and the owner. A difference of a hundred dollars or even a hundred pounds is trivial when compared to the added cost AFTER the product is purchased and in comparing the useful lifetime of the Mac vs. the Windows PC.
and then, there's that ease of use thing, as well as the elegance (technical elegance) of the Mac vs. the PC. The first commenter here, JulesLT, made that point pretty effectively.
By donlevy on Wednesday Apr 15
Look at the Total cost of Ownership
donlevy almost makes the point. The premium for Macs is trivial compared the support costs not incurred, despite their constantly changing processors. One of our Macs is a 17 year old 68040 & still gives no trouble.
By KenBaldry on Friday Aug 7
Business Needs Are Different...
Business purchasers aren't looking for the best computing experience. They are looking for something cheap that does the job.
Large businesses purchase fleets of POS Chryslers or Fords for their employees to drive. These cars have plastic floor-mats instead of carpeting, and gutless engines. You would be embarrassed to purchase one of these cars for yourself. But businesses purchase them in droves because they do the job and are cheap.
When given a choice, people who can afford it purchase Honda's, or Lexuses or BMW's.
It's the same with PC's. Cheap Windows boxes get the job done. Many folks purchase Macintoshes for their use at home. Apple doesn't sell low-end computers. It would tarnish their image, the same way that BMW doesn't compete with Chevy.
As Mac's become more popular for home use, I expect more and more executives that can dicatate to their IT departments to use Macs at work, but by and large the business market will always belong to Windows.
By Randy_Singer on Saturday Aug 8