Symantec patch causes Norton panic
By Stuart Turton,
Security firm Symantec has apologised after an unsigned security patch caused panic among Norton users.
The diagnostic patch PIFTS.exe was included in the latest update for Norton Internet Security with the purpose of anonymously collecting statistics on the computers using its products, according to Symantec.
Unfortunately, "human error" meant the file was unsigned causing firewalls to flag it when it attempted to dial home. Enterprising users discovered the file was attempting to dial out to Norton servers in Africa, and conspiracy theories quickly began to fill the vacuum of silence left by Symantec.
Once story even suggested PIFTS stood for Public Internet File Tracking system, and was a sinister attempt to covertly watch users. These conspiracy theories were further fanned by Norton's decision to delete threads on its forums related to the update.
Symantec claims it wasn't censoring posts, but rather fighting off a spam attack.
"Within minutes, several dozen user accounts were created commenting on the initial thread, and/or creating new threads on the topic," the company says in a statement.
"Over the next few hours, over 200 user accounts were created. Within the first hour there were 600 new posts on this subject alone."
Though it did admit it may have been overzealous in its fire-fighting efforts: "After reviewing some of the emails we've received, it appears that some posts were removed in error, as well as the access of some users... We apologise for this inconvenience, and thank you for your patience while we deal with this difficult situation."
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
Do British police get cyber security?
Davey Winder listens to telephone conversations between the FBI and the Metropolitan Police, courtesy of Anonymous, and isn't impressed.
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- Would you employ a hacker or malware writer?
- Q&A: Raj Samani, CTO McAfee
- Erase and rewind: the EU and privacy
- My email address is [CENSORED]
- Is there such a thing as a secure tablet?
- 2011: The year in news
- BYOD: Old or new, good or bad?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Ubuntu vs. Windows 7 on the business desktop
- York researchers heat storage to speed up data
- BlackBerry Bold 9790 review
- OneNote hits Google?s Android
- O2 trials Olympic-scale remote working
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- Lenovo beats expectations again
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Google to promise fairness after Motorola buy
- Report: Google cloud storage coming soon
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Consistent with patches and upgrades
<p>This highlights the need for the firms that are designing, creating and delivering the defences we commonly use to protect against the ever changing threats to be consistent with patches and upgrades. It is vital for them to recognise that what they are making available and how they will function only constitutes a single part of the <a href="http://www.gradian.co.uk/home.html">security ecosystem</a>.</p>
By Ip_gavin16edccfe on Thursday Mar 12