BBC buys botnet to highlight cybercrime
By Jennifer Scott,
A BBC News technology programme has acquired a botnet from an online chatroom and used it to hijack almost 22,000 computers.
The BBC website said: “If this exercise had been done with criminal intent it would be breaking the law. But our purpose was to demonstrate botnet's collective power when in the hands of criminals.”
Click, the BBC’s technology show, ordered its PCs to send out spam to two specific test e-mail addresses set up by the programme, filling inboxes with thousands of junk messages within hours.
It then launched a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack on a backup site owned by security company Prevx - who had agreed for it to go ahead. Click ordered its slave PCs to bombard its target site with requests for access and it only took 60 machines to overload the site's bandwidth.
Jacques Erasmus from Prevx told the BBC: "Cyber criminals are getting into contact with websites and threatening them with DDoS attacks. The loss of trade is very substantial so a lot of these websites just pay-up to avoid it.”
The botnet has now been destroyed and the users of the unprotected PCs users have been given security advice on how to make their machines less vulnerable.
Greg Day from McAfee told IT PRO: “These botnets are a double edged sword. Not only do they steal from our computers, important information like credit and debit card numbers but, just as insidious, use our PCs to attack others. From a business point of view this can be very damaging."
“The best protection against this is simply up-to-date anti-virus software and network intrusion prevention.”
Click will be broadcast on Saturday 14 March on the BBC News Channel.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
Davey Winder questions what data was stolen from VeriSign and wonders why the company hasn't been more forthcoming.
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- Would you employ a hacker or malware writer?
- Q&A: Raj Samani, CTO McAfee
- Erase and rewind: the EU and privacy
- My email address is [CENSORED]
- Is there such a thing as a secure tablet?
- 2011: The year in news
- BYOD: Old or new, good or bad?
- Are the cookie laws crumbling already?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Google releases Chrome for Android beta
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- OneNote hits Google?s Android
- BlackBerry Bold 9790 review
- Google sends in Bouncer to sort out malicious apps
- Ubuntu vs. Windows 7 on the business desktop
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7
- ACTA: the basics, the controversies, and the future
- BT considering Ofcom price cap appeal
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






It's mind boggling...
...how many millions of people are on the internet and still have no clue about keeping their computers and personal details safe. Any publicity that these issues can get is, in my opinion, a very good thing.
By Ip_ben7dfee9a8a7 on Thursday Mar 12
Noble or stupid?
I agree it is a good thing to point out the problems caused by botnets, but knowing that they spent the licence payers fees purchasing a botnet from the criminals, then adjusted the settings on those pc's after using up the persons bandwidth, they are no better than the criminals themselves. They paid to obtain goods or services that they have no right to, and broke the CMA, all with other peoples money.
By Markjcj on Friday Mar 13