Facebook accused of breaking ‘rights’ promise
By Nicole Kobie,
Facebook has allegedly failed in its attempts at democracy, according to a new report by researchers at the University of Cambridge.
The computer science researchers dubbed the attempt by Facebook to placate its users following a terms and conditions row in February as “democracy theatre”.
In February, Facebook introduced new terms of service, which among other changes included a line saying the social networking site owned any content uploaded by its users, even if they closed their accounts.
Following user uproar, the site promised to change the terms and create a new 'Statement of Rights and Responsibilities' to protect users.
Last month, the site posted its new statement as well as a set of principles “which reflect the philosophy and values we aspire to”, according to Simon Axten, an associate on the public policy team, writing on Facebook’s blog.
But these new documents don't meet the promises made by Facebook when it was trying to calm down its users, the Cambridge report claims, which even alleges that some provisions may not even be legal.
“We mostly agree with Facebook's proposed principles and the goal of an open, transparent, user-driven process for governing a social network. However, the currently drafted statement fails to fulfill these goals, and we feel that well-stated but empty promises are even worse for users than the obfuscated Terms of Use currently in place.”
It added: “They fail to meet not only our own wishes for how a social network like Facebook might be governed, but Facebook's self-professed goal to ‘lead the world’ in openness and equality.”
The report added that the social networking site may have meant well, but stumbled when “confronted with a litany of legal and business complications”.
One of the researchers, Joseph Bonneau, said the outrage over the changed terms showed how much Facebook’s users care about the site. He added that the attempts at clarity are a major step forward – but it’s not enough.
“It seems the goal is not to actually turn governance over to users, but to use the appearance of democracy and user involvement to ward off future criticism,” wrote Bonneau in his blog. “Our term [democracy theatre] may be new, but this trick is not, it has been used by autocratic regimes around the world for decades.”
The group of researchers also slammed the social networking site for continuing to use confusing legal language in its terms, suggesting it follow Creative Commons and publish both legal and “human-readable” versions.
The report also called for Facebook to act as an intermediary between users and application developers, and to intervene when asked by Facebookers. It also said Facebook should seek more balance in its terms, and rather than give itself carte blanche over users' content, it should give itself limits to how such content can be used.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking Analysis & Insight
Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
We chat with Laurent Blanchard, Cisco's vice president of enterprise, to ask why IT should get excited about what the networking giant can offer.
- It's not about the browser, stupid!
- The Great British network squeeze
- New year: new suppliers
- Top 10 tech winners and losers of 2011
- 2011: The year in news
- UK rural broadband: too little, and too late
- HP PCs back on the menu with Dellish plans
- Top 10 social networking tips for enterprise - part one
- Q&A: Why go via telecoms to the cloud?
Latest Networking Reviews
Swyx SwyxExpress X20 review
Rating: ![]()
- Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold Premium 15
- ForeScout Technologies CounterACT 6.3.4
- ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- TITUS Aware for Microsoft Outlook review
- Windows Phone 7 Mango review: First Look
- Dartware InterMapper review
- Kemp Technologies LoadMaster 3600 review
- Sangfor WANACC M5500 review
- Office 365 review: First look
advertisement
Most popular
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- Symantec hackers: We've released pcAnywhere source code
- BT considering Ofcom price cap appeal
- Google sends in Bouncer to sort out malicious apps
- ACTA: the basics, the controversies, and the future
- Trendnet firmware flaw exposes private videos
- Anonymous publishes FBI hacking call
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7
- VeriSign admits 2010 hack
- Nokia Lumia 710 review
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Declined To Comment
Not surprising since Facebook declines to comment to user requests for information or clarity on many occasions.
By Ip5_45721d97767 on Friday Apr 3
eh?
Is it just me or does this article tell us nothing? What is it the 'researchers' object to and what is their proposal? This is all just padding.
By andyrawlins on Monday Apr 13