Can Linux win netbooks back?
By Simon Brew,
In a world that’s seemingly filled with doom and gloom, and stories of failing revenues, pink slips and ever-tightening budgets, the computing industry has found itself something of a salvation. Kick-started by Asus with its Eee PC line, the netbook – as we’ve now come to call it – has been a revelation.
These low-powered, compact machines are selling for just a few hundred pounds at most, and yet are providing the kind of e-mailing and office functionality that a core audience has clearly demanded. What’s more, these netbooks are doing it without the frills, and most crucially of all, the price tag. Sales of 50 million units are predicted in 2012, and there’s a whole lot of growth in the next year or two to get there.
Price
One by-product of the need to get netbooks onto the market with a small price has seen major laptop manufacturers embrace Linux as the operating system they pre-load the machines with.
And it’s easy to see why. One of the biggest and most obstinate slices of the cost of a computer remains the price of the Windows operating system. Offer any manufacturer a legitimate way around that and they’re likely to be interested. This, surely, was Linux’s big chance.
The problem, of course, is that Linux has had many false dawns outside of the server sector – for it’s there where it continues to prove invaluable – and its desktop penetration is less than one per cent of the entire market. That’s in spite of the fact that it’s free of charge on the whole, and that there are hundreds of variants for people to choose from. Throw in the fact that Linux is far more secure than Windows, and it should be an easy and compelling sales message to get across.
Only it’s not quite that simple. For Linux has been hamstrung by a general perception that you need to be quite technically minded to get the most out of it. Many users may scream blue murder at Windows, but it keeps them within the safe confines of a graphical user interface, and there’s generally a friend of a friend on the end of the phone to fix it if things go to pot.
Linux, even in its most accessible form, requires a little unlearning of Windows, and even something like Ubuntu – generally regarded as the most welcoming Linux distribution – occasionally has the need to send you hunting for a command line. That command line alone is likely to have sent people scuttling back to the Microsoft tent. Remove the comfort blanket of familiarity, no matter how flawed it is, and customers start wanting their Windows back, it seems.
That difficulty, combined with the dominance of Windows, means Linux faces a major uphill struggle, free or not. Ironically, the sheer number of choices may also be an Achilles' heel to mainstream take-up, given that people generally don’t mind choosing between box A and box B, but give them a warehouse full of them to look at, and they start to panic.
Support
The netbook, therefore, should have marked a turning point, because the crucial difference here was that there was manufacturer support. Granted, we’ve seen that before from time to time, but here was a machine that was being promoted with Linux installed, and had the comfort of a telephone support line should problems arise, rather than the usual need to hit Google.
Microsoft was late to react, too. When the first Eee PC rolled off the production line, Microsoft was still talking about phasing out Windows XP. The sudden impact of the netbook forced it to delay that still further.
Despite that, consumers were getting a choice for the first time. Walk into a store and instead of being met with wall-to-wall Windows or Mac OS-equipped computers, there were Linux alternatives available off the shelf. The problem? Consumers began rejecting the choice, and Windows quickly regained its lost ground.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Netbooks News
Intel splashes $120 million on RealNetworks patents
Intel gets patents and software in a $120 million deal with the RealPlayer owner.
advertisement
Most popular
- Virgin remains on top in broadband speed race
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- MPs call for infection detection database
- A data shock warning for Orange customers
- What can Intel bring to the smartphone market?
- T-Mobile announces 'UK's first' fully unlimited deals
- Nokia Lumia 710 review
- Cisco launches turbo-powered wireless access point
- Facebook unveils $10bn IPO plans
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7




you've never used a Linux netbook, right?
If you had, you'd know that the tabbed net appliance UI might be perfect for someone who's computer illiterate but even inexperienced computer users know what a conventional desktop UI looks like. Remember the wave of net appliances of a few years ago? The vendors who sold them who are still in business sell something else now. Very few people want a computer dumbed down to the pure net appliance role (the Eee PC doesn't even let you install more than a handful of apps in OEM form. check out these reviews http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductReview.aspx?Item=N82E16834220368 The Linux netbook UI has nothing in particular to do with the conventional desktop UI whether it's Linux or XP home. The Linux netbook UI in most places is crapware customized by netbook manufacturers to fit the needs of a user who is for the most part, imaginary. A real Linux desktop UI looks like a generic desktop UI. What does it tell you about a OEM OS install when the great majority of Linux users replace it with something else IMMEDIATELY? (usually some form of Ubuntu with netbook specific drivers)
By alizard on Tuesday Apr 21
Just returned a Linux netbook
I've just returned a linux-powered netbook after a weekend of trying to make the operating system and installed applications do what I wanted to do... and failing. I'm not exactly Linux illiterate, as I have a live Linux distro on hand for fixing the odd WinXP disaster, but the manufacturer of the netbook chose to install a very limited distro with a set of dumbed down applications, and even hid most of the configuration options behind a terminal command line! The real killer for me was the poor quality of the bundled applications with the distro - I couldn't even change the date to UK format or alter the font sizes to make better use of the screen - the email program was reduced to running full screen to get it all in. Clearly some effort had been made so the distro outwardly resembled XP. So why not offer functional programs with it too? It worked, but could have been so much better. My attempts to install more powerful programs required command line expertise, and then fell down on "missing dependencies". So at that point my patience ran out, it went back in the box, and is being exchanged for an XP-powered netbook, where I can plug my USB key in and use my portable apps for my key tasks like email and diary. I know there are better distros out there, but simply don't have the time to find and install one, then learn its unique features, when I can simply walk into a store and pick up something that runs XP out of the box.
By survivalskills on Tuesday Apr 21
Which Linux
Some of those netbook makers have made very poor choices of Linux distro. It's not "Linux" that blew it, it's those companies. They should have approached one of the leading distros for assistance, instead of choosing one - seemingly at random - and doing a chop job on it. Ubuntu is now producing a netbook version on their own initiative, what those machines should have had in the first place. There wouldn't have been nearly as many returns.
By greenknight32 on Tuesday Apr 21
Vendors don't help....
Had a look at an Acer netbook - and the version of Linux on there was so hobbled it was virtually useless to me, and looked so dumbed down compared to Windows that I guess others were turned off by that. I still bought one - and replaced it with OpenSUSE 11.1 and it runs like a dream. Then again I work extensively with Linux and it was a very easy thing for me to do. Not so for others who aren't so tech-aware. There needs to be a happy medium that appeals to all camps - and that is not an easy thing to achieve given Microsoft's dominance. People usually stick to what they are used to, and many can't be bothered to make the switch.
By Ip_colintf7fca10 on Tuesday Apr 21
What Linux support?
I'm very happy with my ACER One with Linpus Lite but only because it boots up in seconds and runs very well with just 512MB RAM. Support from user forums has been good but ACER have been absolutely useless. A recent update zapped my 3G dongle. First ACER support suggested uninstalling the update (impossible because all updates are flagged as 'critical'). They then suggested I recovered the OS without applying the update. Unfortunately, this is quite a big task as I've added a lot of very good (and free) applications. Undoubtedly, I would also be continually prompted to download the missing update. Fortunately, Vodafone have come to the rescue with a Linux version of 'mobile connect'. So, top marks to ACER for a very good low cost machine but zero marks for their appalling Linux support (especially in view of the very large numbers of machines sold).
By gtscad on Wednesday Apr 22
for information on alternative netbook
linux distros, there's info if you google on ubuntu-eee , there's information on the Ubuntu site, and if your system is still in warranty and you want to install to a SDHC flash card living in the card reader built into the netbook, try http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1325265
By alizard on Friday Apr 24