Facebook vote confirms new terms despite low turnout
By Nicole Kobie,
When it comes to voter apathy, online democracy isn’t much different than the offline variety, Facebook has discovered.
Facebook gave its users a week to vote on new governance documents, following uproar when the site changed its terms of service without asking its users first.
Nearly three-quarters of voters said they liked the new ‘Facebook Principles’ and ‘Statement of Rights and Responsibilities’ better than the current terms, but just 600,000 people voted.
While that may sound like a decent turnout, the site has 200 million users world wide, so just 0.3 per cent bothered to cast their vote, despite Facebook offering it in a variety of languages and advertising it across the site.
“We'd hoped to have a bigger turnout for this inaugural vote, but it is important to keep in mind that this vote was a first for users just like it was a first for Facebook,” said Ted Ullyot, Facebook's general counsel, in a blog posting.
“We are hopeful that there will be greater participation in future votes," he added.
Ullyot said that Facebook would lower the 30 per cent threshold on voting, which required that proportion of the site’s users to vote against something in order to force a change. Currently, it would require 60 million people to actually vote to have the result be binding.
The new terms will come into play soon, Ullyot wrote, once the vote’s results have been externally audited.
Earlier this month, researchers called the vote "democracy theatre," saying “it seems the goal is not to actually turn governance over to users, but to use the appearance of democracy and user involvement to ward off future criticism.”
Read on to find out why we haven't managed to create the People's Republic of Facebook quite yet.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking Analysis & Insight
Bring you own device: the $600 question
Inside the enterprise: A recent Cisco report claims bring your own device is gaining support from IT departments. But how much are staff willing to invest in personal technology?
- Interop 2012: Q&A, Saar Gillai, CTO, HP Networking
- Is BT the key to broadband Britain?
- Tencent: the biggest web company you’ve never heard of
- The truth about spam
- Have ISPs finally lost the DEA fight?
- Are you ready to launch IPv6 securely?
- Broadband, pricing and small businesses
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
- Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
Latest Networking Reviews
HP t410 All-in-One Thin Client review: First look
- Swyx SwyxExpress X20 review
- Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold Premium 15
- ForeScout Technologies CounterACT 6.3.4
- ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- TITUS Aware for Microsoft Outlook review
- Windows Phone 7 Mango review: First Look
- Dartware InterMapper review
- Kemp Technologies LoadMaster 3600 review
- Sangfor WANACC M5500 review
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





