£1 million given for ‘ultra-fast’ 10Gbs broadband
By Asavin Wattanajantra,
An organisation supporting UK businesses has invested £1 million in companies researching ‘ultra-fast’ broadband.
The Technology Strategy Board, established by he government to promote UK innovation, is ultimately looking at broadband speeds of between one and 10Gbs – said to be 100 to 1,000 times faster than current connections.
There are 13 projects in total, which cost between £30,000 and £100,000. Collaborating with researchers in Europe, these could then lead to better-funded EU research partnerships.
Mike Biddle, lead technologist at the Technology Strategy Board, believes that success could lead to a Europe-wide ultra fast optical broadband network.
Biddle said it had the potential to give European businesses a “major competitive edge” and “change the way businesses operate.”
He asked: “Imagine the efficiencies that could be achieved through broadband that’s up to 1,000 times faster we have now.”
“Then add the opportunities for more flexible working arrangements and you begin to see the many advantages,” he added.
One of the projects is a road-mapping study involving BT, Ericsson and Cambridge University, which will seek the most cost-effective, simple and future-proof ways of providing 10Gbs speeds.
Once the study is finished, the results will be made available to the rest of the industry to enable to next stage of development to take place.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking Analysis & Insight
Bring you own device: the $600 question
Inside the enterprise: A recent Cisco report claims bring your own device is gaining support from IT departments. But how much are staff willing to invest in personal technology?
- Interop 2012: Q&A, Saar Gillai, CTO, HP Networking
- Is BT the key to broadband Britain?
- Tencent: the biggest web company you’ve never heard of
- The truth about spam
- Have ISPs finally lost the DEA fight?
- Are you ready to launch IPv6 securely?
- Broadband, pricing and small businesses
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
- Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
Latest Networking Reviews
HP t410 All-in-One Thin Client review: First look
- Swyx SwyxExpress X20 review
- Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold Premium 15
- ForeScout Technologies CounterACT 6.3.4
- ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- TITUS Aware for Microsoft Outlook review
- Windows Phone 7 Mango review: First Look
- Dartware InterMapper review
- Kemp Technologies LoadMaster 3600 review
- Sangfor WANACC M5500 review
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






What about the servers?
Not only does the bandwidth have to be increased but the servers are slowing down which eventually give us brwon outs. We are noticing today with the vast amount of people being on the net that the system is slowing down. This is not only due to Iplayer and youtube but the servers cannot cope with the amount of requests they get. So don't only think about the cable and fibre optics, think about the servers too.
By ICMC1 on Tuesday May 19
Out with the Old, In with the New
If such projects are to be worth considering, then there is absolutely no choice but to drop older incompatible technologies running currently over Copper and to consolidate existing compatible technologies.
To make such an enterprise successful, to allow for a network to be built quickly, there needs to be a a singular standard managed by a singular entity.
I would suggest that the best way for any project involving such a radical upgrade would be for there to be the formation of a new independant body separate from existing Telecommunications and Entertainment companies. Such a body would be initially co-funded by both the government and interested companies but would not be "Owned" by the government or by "Shareholders" Initial Funding would offset subsequent charges. Such a Company would be considered a Utility but would not be regionalised, nor would operators/staff of such a Utility be allowed to receive Bonuses for doing their job.
This independant body would be responsible for building a national backbone, regional inphrastructure, and "Fibre Connection Into the Home". End Users would rent this Fibre Connection directly from the independant body which would levy a non-profit charge which initially would be fairly high to offset the development costs but would subsequently drop to a minimal level high enough to cover the cost of maintenance, expansion and development of new technologies.
BT, Virgin, BBC, Sky, Vodaphone, 3, O2, T-mobile to name the major players in the UK would, pay for the privilidge of providing services over this network, perhaps by buying bandwidth and PetaBytes of data and would recharge these costs to consumers as part of the services they would provide.
Independant companies and public/private bodies including the Government, Councils, Military, Public Bodies - Police/Fire/NHS/Schools - would be able to establish independant network service over the inphrastructure.
Mobile Network would be able to use the network to carry voice/data/3g/4g services from antenna
The presence of a single network (with built in robust multiple redundancies to cope with peaks of use, growth and outages such as damaged cables allowing for 100% continued service with substantial failures or sabotage)
The independant body would not be allowed to sell services over the network, only the rental of a line, similarly the "Service Providers" would not be allowed to charge line rental or connection charges, only a time/volume based charge for each service or group of services.
BT/Virgin Telephone Lines (some 40-70 years old), Local Loop Cabinets, Exchanges, and other equipment where not capable of operating over an independant fibre network would not be needed and would have to be decomissioned.
For me this would be the most cost effective and competative method of introducing a radical new network. Since the network is not owned by any service provider and charges for the physical connection directly to the end-user all end-users would pay the same charge for a line. Service Providers including those who formerly operated their own networks would be able to compete on an even playing field.
Any company would be able to provide Fixed/Mobile Voice Services, and it would in essence be possible to introduce PicoCell Devices allowing Mobile phones to act as Fixed phones from home but perhaps using the same number/account as when mobile.
Video Conferencing Services as an extension of 3/4g Mobile service would be possible with improved quality, coverage and reduced cost.
Data Services would be possible by using an allocated section of bandwidth, providing budget data connections as well as Ultra Hi speed connections
Entertainment services including TV/Cable/Satellite services would be available over the network without the requirement to pay for more than a single decoder perhaps converting proprietory technologies such as Cable/Satellite signals into a HiDef Freeview/Sat Type signal within the house to allow multiple tuners to be used and access to multiple channels concurrently. This would allow for such technologies to be easily distributed throughout the house using Gigabit Wired or WiFi/WiMax wireless technologies.
It would be possible to change the metric with which such services are provided, separately and collectively allowing for a greater flexibility in billing services and the manner in which they are provided and used. For example perhaps allowing a Video Conference to be transfered between a 3/4g mobile handset a work based station and a home based station without interrupting the call or the need to levy 30 different charges or 3 different rates for one call, by virtue of the changes in medium and transit of the call.
All it takes is one person to take charge and say this is the way it is to be done, we will adopt the most flexible and least costly most upgradeable long term route where we will provide 22nd Century type facilities now rather than screwing the last penny out of 20th century technologies and the customers and providers will be offering services on an even field.
By Hitman101 on Tuesday May 19
10Gbs Broadband
Broadband isn't a 'thing' it is purely a descriptive word, like 'expansive'. Data transmissions are all high speed - at or near the speed of light, depending upon the transmission medium. It's the data transfer rate that under consideration here - and rates are measured in bits per second (b/s) and not bs.
By viclud on Tuesday May 19