ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    Digital Britain broadband tax: Should we pay?

2Mb or not 2Mb? That is the question circling the tech news and living rooms today following the release of the long awaited Digital Britain report.

By Jennifer Scott, 17 Jun 2009 at 13:40

Jennifer Scott

COMMENT: So I waited and waited. I wrote about all the rumours, the pre-report reports, the ministerial speeches. I go on holiday for a few days and the Digital Britain report gets launched without me. Well there was no way this was going to pass me by without me putting my two megabits in.

The main story, and the one that interests us all at IT PRO, is about the recommendation of a £6 “tax” on phone lines to help pay for the roll out of broadband at the minimum speed of 2Mbps to everyone in the UK - the promise made by Lord Carter, although he has until 2012 to put the wires in place.

So is this 50p a month a nominal fee for a necessary commodity or just another stealth tax for something we haven’t asked for?

A broadband speed of 2Mbps is barely enough to stream live TV yet many people in the country don’t have this speed, if any internet at all. This was always going to be a huge part of Lord Carter’s report and finding a way to allow everyone to have at least the basics seemed imperative. Surveys even recently showed broadband being as important to people as water or electricity so surely everyone would understand the need for a little levy to get this going?

It seems, however, that when the money to pay for it is coming out of our pockets, we are less than keen on the idea. In reality, not everyone wants broadband. I can hardly see my rather elderly next door neighbour pounding on the commons door were she not able to check her Facebook account. However, she does need her phone line and, as small as £6 may be, is it fair she should have to pay it?

Flip the coin though and it must be admitted that for all those who don’t need nor desire the World Wide Web, there are plenty more stuck in areas unable to simply check an email account, let alone catch up with Eastenders on their iPlayer.

I can understand the anger surrounding this report. Lord Carter is scarpering off back to the private sector before anything gets implemented, and money from the tax payer may be moved from funding the public television station to failing private ones but, seriously, is everyone up in arms about £6?

The internet is, in my opinion, a necessity. Not perhaps imperative for pleasure but certainly for work, communication and information. I am happy to sit at home and play cards, have a chat over a glass of wine, but I would not be happy if I couldn’t check train times, get an email informing me of tube strikes, know if a meeting got moved suddenly before I left home or just be able to look up something that has interested me to learn more about it.

The vast majority of people with a phone line will have or want broadband, so whilst you may have to buy one less iTune a month, you are ensuring the internet is not the privilege of a postcode lottery but available for all.

We don’t know if this so-called tax is going to be implemented or not yet but really Britain, open your wallets for the cause of broadband for all. If it goes through at least we can all transfer the funds online and there are even more people who might ask to follow you on Twitter.

Email to a friend

Print this page

< Previous   Public Sector : News Next >

7 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

RE:

Yes! I have one relative who can't get a reliable 'phone or broadband connection barely 3km from a major 'phone exchange, and another who couldn't care less about IT. So I totally agree with the balance of views in this article. Excellent. However, if we all get totally dependent on broadband services, should government be concentrating more on what happens when it all breaks due to terrorist hacking, sunspot activity or major disruption to power supplies in the aftermath of a deadly pandemic?

By pdfisk on Thursday Jun 18

2 people out of 5 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

How did we function before?

People managed quite well without internet for many years. Suddenly it is the end of the world if they don't have access. Why do people move to these areas without researching the pitfalls? They must have noticed there are no large supermarkets nearby or mains gas supply to give a hint of other shortfalls? So what happened to old methods of communication such as the landline telephone?

By Victor_Meldrew on Friday Jun 19

2 people out of 4 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Victor -

Yes, we used to manage OK before the internet - I remember we used to manage before we had a telephone. People got by without rubbish collections, before the police force, even before we had electricity. Do you suggest we have now reached the peak of evolution? Should we stop now?

By coldstream on Friday Jun 19

0 people out of 1 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Another expense

Why should people who don't want broadband pay for other people's? What have BT done with all the money they have had from their customers for all these years?

By Daz_Ryan on Friday Jun 19

3 people out of 3 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Let the user pay.

Charge users for the amount they use,as with electricity and gas. A charge of,say 20p per GB would be affordable to most people and may deter those who boast of downloading 1TB per month and who claim nothing can stop their P2P/torrent activity. The challenge will be to ensure that the money is spent wisely and for the greatest infrastructure improvement.

By Mike_Bear on Friday Jun 19

0 people out of 1 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Still no guaranteeS

I pay towards the National Heath but can't find a National Heath dentist and therefore have to pay twice as I don't get a refund on the NI contributions. BT has fixed price with upto 8Mb offered - but their initial estimate for my location was 3Mb, however in reality I only get 0.5Mb - but again no refund for what was offered but not actually delivered. Will the fibre-optic broadband be any different - all promises and just excuses and small print on why after you have paid your money they still don't deliver and - yes no refund!!

By trebor on Saturday Jun 20

0 people out of 0 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Are you forgetting how much we pay already?

So according to this, we are ALL currently getting what we paid for? The last time i checked i pay for a 6MEG connection speed,and just like lots of others only get a portion of that.. so now your telling me it's now down us to pay again so i can get what i am already paying for!?!?! I pay my money to get a the advertised speed, and they cover there butts by saying best available speed.. Now they are basically saying that they know the best available speed is way under what they are advertising.. so Yeah, I'll pay the £6 when the ISP charge me for what i am currently getting... and i know the £6 pound is going to my phone line instead of a ISP fat cats new car or xmas party.

By jamstaa69 on Sunday Jun 28

0 people out of 0 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

    You may also like...

 Sponsored Links

advertisement

    You may also like...

advertisement

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement