British protests show privacy matters
By Nicole Kobie,
Exhibitionists though they may seem, Facebook’s users weren’t okay with that, and a mass online protest led Facebook to not only revert back to the earlier terms, but to also ensure it has to ask permission before making such a change in the future.
It recently announced a trial of a new simplified privacy system, in fact. Lesson learned, then?
Phorm
Phorm has been hit by privacy concerns and campaigners since it launched its deep packet inspection advertising system in the UK a few years ago.
The secret BT trials probably weren’t going to cause smiles and joy amongst customers, but the telco and Phorm clearly didn’t expect Britons to mind their network traffic being scanned. Seems like they did.
Phorm would say the privacy concerns were blown out of proportion by activists, and even BT said privacy wasn’t its concern but costs when it ditched the service a few weeks back.
Open Rights Group's Jim Killock said at the time: "This is the right decision for BT and other online providers who respect privacy."
Indeed, the controversy surrounding Phorm is impossible to ignore, and other ISPs like Virgin Media have had to reassure customers they’ll ask first before deploying.
There are other behavioural advertising firms out there, and if Phorm’s experience is anything to go by, they best keep privacy in mind or they’ll make some enemies pretty darn quick.
The government
The current government seems to consider privacy as something that’s a trade for other things, like security or social services.
Want to keep safe from terrorism? We’ll need to track all your emails and phone calls. Oh and you’ll need an identity card too.
Want access to benefits? We’ll need you to fill out this form – don’t worry, it’s just for a massive database that lots of people will have access to.
With the government’s track record on data security, it’s hard to buy any promises that said data won’t be put on disks and go missing.
But personal privacy and the right to not be stored on a database is fast becoming a hot political issue. The Conservatives have promised to scrap the ID card system, while Labour was forced to scale back plans to monitor web and phone traffic after public outrage – not to mention industry players pointing out the futility and expense of it all.
If ID cards, privacy and data security do actually become a serious election subject, the government could quickly see just how seriously Britons take such issues.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking News
Unifed comms confusion blights adoption, research shows
Survey shows CIOs are reluctant to invest because of concerns over costs and deployment.
Latest Networking Tutorials
Internet Explorer 8 in action
As the Internet Explorer 8 release candidate becomes available to download Mary Branscombe looks at what your users are going to be making support calls about, from rich search results to anonymous browsing.
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Latest Analysis & Insight Videos in Networking
Q&A: Mikko Hyppönen, chief research officer, F-Secure
We ask one of the leading experts on cyber crime for an assessment of the recent spate of cyber attacks and the growing threats to companies...






Its 192 people should be upset about not 118800
There has been such a huge stink about 118800 and I for one don't get it.
Go to 192.com, thats the yellow pages to you and me and type in your name and town and they will tell all and sundry your name, address, who you're living with, your neighbors, any company director info on you etc. I'd much rather shut down 192 than 118800. the 118 people only send me a message saying that someone is calling, they don't actually give out my details. Over at 192 they give enough information to help someone steal your ID.... THEY EVEN LIST YOUR MOTHERS MAIDEN NAME! How many of us use that for a security question!?
By Daviid on Wednesday Jul 15
Telemarketing
Having registered with TPS years ago, I was furious to politely point this out to a telemarketer recently only to be told we're on 118 ..I didn't totally understand what she meant, and she told me I was stupid for not knowing! I merely told her again we'd opted out of such marketing calls and she got pretty abusive and told me I was rude and refused to tell me what company she was working for.
By McColl on Friday Jul 17
Dont give out mobile numbers?
As far as I was aware 118800 dont actually give out mobile numbers, they connect people, have a read of this http://www.scribd.com/doc/19639348/118800
By Petes on Tuesday Nov 17