Pipes are pointless without digital participation
By Asavin Wattanajantra,
The managing director of an organisation helping British citizens learn IT skills has said that it was "a scandal" that the Digital Britain report focused too much on pipes rather than people.
Helen Milner, the managing director for UK online centres, firmly criticised the comparably low £12 million funding over three years spent on digital inclusion, compared to the £200 million a year spent on infrastructure outlined in the Digital Britain report.
She was speaking at the Westminster eForum in London, where the general feeling was that the Digital Britain report would come to nothing unless the digitally excluded proportion of the UK population developed skills to use new technology.
Milner said: “Every million more people we get on board will bring £200 to £300 million into the broadband industry. I know that from looking at stats from the industry itself.”
Anna Bradley, chair of the Communications Consumer Panel, had earlier repeated a quote from Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer, who said that the main benefit of IT was that it empowered people.
“It lets people be creative and productive,” added Bradley. “It lets people learn things they couldn’t learn before, and so in a sense it is all about potential."
Both Milner and Bradley said they were looking forward to working with ‘Digital Champion’ Martha Lane Fox, who was recently hired by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills in a push to help the 17 million ‘excluded’ from digital technology.
Sponsored Links
advertisement
Latest Networking Analysis & Insight
Bring you own device: the $600 question
Inside the enterprise: A recent Cisco report claims bring your own device is gaining support from IT departments. But how much are staff willing to invest in personal technology?
- Interop 2012: Q&A, Saar Gillai, CTO, HP Networking
- Is BT the key to broadband Britain?
- Tencent: the biggest web company you’ve never heard of
- The truth about spam
- Have ISPs finally lost the DEA fight?
- Are you ready to launch IPv6 securely?
- Broadband, pricing and small businesses
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
- Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
Latest Networking Reviews
HP t410 All-in-One Thin Client review: First look
- Swyx SwyxExpress X20 review
- Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold Premium 15
- ForeScout Technologies CounterACT 6.3.4
- ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- TITUS Aware for Microsoft Outlook review
- Windows Phone 7 Mango review: First Look
- Dartware InterMapper review
- Kemp Technologies LoadMaster 3600 review
- Sangfor WANACC M5500 review
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.



digital participation needs pipes
you can't have one without the other. It is lack of access that has put many people off using it. The main need for access is for rural people who can't get to libraries, churches, pubs, post offices and shops. They are the truly digitally disengaged, but not through choice. The ones who can get access in towns and don't want it need leaving alone. You don't make people wash just cos they have water?
By cyberdoyle on Friday Jul 17