Alan Turing petition garners support from thousands
By Maggie Holland,
An online petition calling for Alan Turing, the man who championed the code breaking efforts during World War II, to be give a posthumous apology from the government has received an overwhelming level of support.
At the time of publication, more than 17,000 people had added their names to the petition, which is demanding that the government apologise for the way Turing was treated after a conviction for gross indecency in 1952 – something many believe ultimately caused his death two years later.
John Graham-Cumming, programmer and author of the Geek Atlas, the man behind the petition has also written to Her Majesty the Queen to request that Turing be honoured with a posthumous knighthood too.
“…Alan Turing’s life ended in tragedy when after being prosecuted for ‘gross indecency’ (Alan Turing was a homosexual) he was forced to have estrogen injections and committed suicide. On that day in 1954, at age 41, Great Britain lost one of its greatest minds,” he wrote in the letter, a copy of which he posted on his blog.
“Since then Great Britain has done little to honour him. A section of road in Manchester is named after him, and a blue plaque is fixed to the wall of his former home.”
The letter continues: “I write today to Your Majesty to ask that Alan Turing be honoured with a posthumous knighthood that recognises what a great man he was; there is no doubt in my mind that if Turing had lived past age 41 his international impact would have been great and that he likely would have received a knighthood while alive.”
Labour MP Tom Watson is one of the many high-profile names backing the campaign. “Hard to do posthumous stuff in law but Alan Turing does need some kind of state recognition,” he said earlier today on Twitter.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking Analysis & Insight
Bring you own device: the $600 question
Inside the enterprise: A recent Cisco report claims bring your own device is gaining support from IT departments. But how much are staff willing to invest in personal technology?
- Interop 2012: Q&A, Saar Gillai, CTO, HP Networking
- Is BT the key to broadband Britain?
- Tencent: the biggest web company you’ve never heard of
- The truth about spam
- Have ISPs finally lost the DEA fight?
- Are you ready to launch IPv6 securely?
- Broadband, pricing and small businesses
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
- Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
Latest Networking Reviews
HP t410 All-in-One Thin Client review: First look
- Swyx SwyxExpress X20 review
- Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold Premium 15
- ForeScout Technologies CounterACT 6.3.4
- ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- TITUS Aware for Microsoft Outlook review
- Windows Phone 7 Mango review: First Look
- Dartware InterMapper review
- Kemp Technologies LoadMaster 3600 review
- Sangfor WANACC M5500 review
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






RE:
It is unfortunate Turing but achieving feats shouldn't make any of us above the law. Turing was not victimized, I believe, taking it to be that we are angels and the government is the devil is wrong, most of us would have agreed with the happenings at the time. If we wish to honour his contributions now nothing stops us, we go ahead.
By bluepond on Wednesday Sep 16