ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    Should software companies be liable for data breaches?

A security breach notification law could be a step in the right direction, according to a public policy expert.

By Asavin Wattanajantra, 18 Sep 2009 at 14:39

Holding software companies, ISPs and financial institutions liable for public and private sector data breaches could help prevent them, according to an internet public policy expert.

Speaking at ENISA’s annual security conference in Greece, Ian Brown, a senior research fellow at the Oxford Internet Institute, said that holding them liable could help prevent data breaches better than direct spending on government intervention.

But Brown admitted such a rule would be politically difficult to enforce. Last year, the immediate response by the UK government to a House of Lords report recommending a new data-breach law on liability was a firm ‘no’.

Brown said: “They didn’t give a reason why. I imagine part of the reason - and I’m not being super-cynical here - was that behind the scenes there were software companies, ISPs and banks that are influential within government.”

He said that security breach notification laws were a step in the right direction, at least forcing firms to be transparent when things went wrong.

“I think there are some government MPs who would still like to move in that direction, and I think that would be a positive thing,” he added.

Email to a friend

Print this page

< Previous   Security : News Next >

1 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

Too late...

This sort of move is about 30 years too late. Software today is too complex. It impossible to test it completely. All you can hope for is best effort and that the developers and admins respond in a timely manner, when a breach is discovered. It would be nice and it sounds easy when you look at it at a political level. Look deeper and who do you blame? The user? The admin who runs the site? The company that installed the computer? The software developer? The person who configured the software? The person who configured the OS? The person who installed a 3rd party app? The os manufacturer? There are just too many variables to lay the blame clearly in all cases. In some cases, where an admin fails to secure a network, you have a scapegoat, but when it is a combination of user, application, driver, operating system and infrastructure, who is to blame?

By big_D on Friday Sep 18

0 people out of 0 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

    You may also like...

 Sponsored Links

advertisement

    You may also like...

advertisement

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement