Why the London Stock Exchange went for Linux
By Asavin Wattanajantra,
The London Stock Exchange (LSE) will replace its Microsoft .NET-based trading platform TradeElect with a Linux-based system from MillenniumIT.
Rather than just buy the trading platform though, the London Stock Exchange Group will buy the whole MillenniumIT company for £18 million.
The deal will be fully completed by the middle of October, with the MillenniumIT trading system put in place starting in mid to late 2010.
In an interview with IT PRO, LSE spokesman Alistair Fairbrother said that the main reason it bought MillenniumIT was to bring the system's development within the LSE group.
“It not only gives ourselves a new high performance trading platform called 'Millennium Exchange' which we will be migrating onto, but it also gives us control over future development releases,” he said.
Fairbrother claimed that this was the main reason why the LSE made the purchase rather, than any new focus on Linux and open source technology.
“We’ve had a very good working relationship with Microsoft. This is not about moving away from Microsoft.NET. For us this is about getting control over our IT development,” he explained.
However, he did say that the system change would save £10 million per year from 2011 and 2012, due to the LSE bringing in costs in-house rather than from having an external supplier.
MillenniumIT has already tested the system using data from the LSE. Fairbrother said that the system offered high performance, was highly scalable, and could perform at sub-millisecond speeds.
“We can be a little more responsive, and a little more flexible with future upgrades than we have been in the past,” he said.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Strategy Analysis & Insight
What should RIM do to recapture the attention of businesses?
We asked some of the experts on our IT Leader Board what RIM should do next to help elevate its status in the enterprise space. Here’s what they had to say…
- Q&A: Colin Bannister, UK CTO, CA Technologies
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- What can Intel bring to the smartphone market?
- Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
- Q&A: Raj Samani, CTO McAfee
- Erase and rewind: the EU and privacy
- Does 2012 spell doom and gloom for the tech sector?
- OK, computer
- Datacentre data crunch
Latest Strategy Reviews
ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- Office 365 review: First look
- Novell ZENworks Configuration Management 11 Standard Edition review
- Mindjet MindManager 9 review
- Tableau Desktop Professional Edition review
- Spiceworks review
- Head to Head: Parallels Desktop 6 vs VMware Fusion 3
- Swiftlight review
- FaceTime Communications USG-1030 review
- Top 10 iPad apps for business review
advertisement
Most popular
- Virgin remains on top in broadband speed race
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- MPs call for infection detection database
- A data shock warning for Orange customers
- What can Intel bring to the smartphone market?
- T-Mobile announces 'UK's first' fully unlimited deals
- Nokia Lumia 710 review
- Cisco launches turbo-powered wireless access point
- Facebook unveils $10bn IPO plans
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7
Latest News Videos in Strategy
Q&A: David Elton, PA Consulting Group
CIOs are increasingly influential, but have to juggle "dual roles", study finds.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Diplomacy
Clearly, you can't tell the difference between diplomacy and technology. Everything quoted by Alistair Fairbrother in your article highlights the differences between GNU/Linux and a secret, proprietary system like Microsoft produces; "high performance", "control over our IT development", and, of course, cost savings. The IT world is changing (for the better) -- get used to it.
By 6tricky9 on Saturday Oct 10