Could Hotmail password theft be due to a trojan?
By Asavin Wattanajantra,
A security researcher has claimed that some of the passwords stolen from Hotmail, Gmail and other webmail services were the result of a data theft trojan rather than a phishing attack.
Originally 10,000 Hotmail passwords were leaked onto the pastebin website, posted by an anonymous user. Later on, Google confirmed Gmail had been targeted as well.
Although Microsoft and Google have both said that the passwords were taken as a result of phishing, ScanSafe security researcher Mary Landesman said there was no way that the companies could have been totally sure of this.
Speaking to IT PRO she said: “No offence to, and I don’t mean to undermine either Microsoft and Google, but certainly neither one of them can actually definitively either.”
“I think they came out with phishing as the most likely explanation in their minds without having really gone over the lists in great detail,” she added.
Landesman said that there were a lot of indicators in the password lists that are consistent with data theft rather than phishing.
“It doesn’t mean that 100 per cent of the list was derived from either source [phishing or trojan], more likely a combination of sources,” she said.
The researcher said that one tell-tale sign of a possible trojan was that 1,369 of the account records appeared more than once and as some as many as five times.
“Phishing scams do not typically vet the usernames and passwords when they receive them," she said.
“The fact that there actually seems to be failed login attempts is much more indicative of a keylogger or some sort of trojan capture.”
She also said on her blog post that previous lists of known phished accounts generally saw some victims left nonsensical messages as they realised that they were being phished, but this list had no such entries.
She said that although '123456' did appear in the list as a password, it still only appeared 63 times out of the 10,000 records, and by and large most of the users had respectable passwords, so were potentially less likely to fall for a phishing scam.
Microsoft and Google had not responded to our request for comment on Landesman’s remarks at the time of publication.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
Do British police get cyber security?
Davey Winder listens to telephone conversations between the FBI and the Metropolitan Police, courtesy of Anonymous, and isn't impressed.
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- Would you employ a hacker or malware writer?
- Q&A: Raj Samani, CTO McAfee
- Erase and rewind: the EU and privacy
- My email address is [CENSORED]
- Is there such a thing as a secure tablet?
- 2011: The year in news
- BYOD: Old or new, good or bad?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Ubuntu vs. Windows 7 on the business desktop
- York researchers heat storage to speed up data
- BlackBerry Bold 9790 review
- OneNote hits Google?s Android
- O2 trials Olympic-scale remote working
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- Lenovo beats expectations again
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Google to promise fairness after Motorola buy
- Report: Google cloud storage coming soon
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





