EC urges UK and Europe to do more about spam
By Asavin Wattanajantra,
The European Commission has urged EU countries to do more to tackle spam and secure online privacy.
The EC recognised countries like the UK had made efforts to fight the war against spam, but claimed that there was a need for clearer enforcement rules, better international cooperation and new legislation.
The call comes as it released a European report showing that in Britain although spam and spyware issues received considerable publicity, few formal controls or cooperation procedures existed.
For example, Ofcom did not regulate internet content and would advise people with concerns to go to ISPs.
Also, the report said that while legislation had been introduced, sanctions were still limited and the agencies charged with enforcing the rules had few resources.
There was good news in terms of Europe, with almost all countries having one or more websites where they could find information or make a complaint.
Viviane Reding, the EU Commissioner for Information Society and Media, believed that the war against spam was an area that needed to be better fought.
She said in a statement: “Although since 2002, European law has prohibited spam and spyware, on average 65 per cent of EU citizens are still affected by spam on a regular basis.
“We need to step up our fight against spammers and make sure that the EU adopts legislation that provides for string civil and criminal sanctions against spammers.”
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
Do British police get cyber security?
Davey Winder listens to telephone conversations between the FBI and the Metropolitan Police, courtesy of Anonymous, and isn't impressed.
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- Would you employ a hacker or malware writer?
- Q&A: Raj Samani, CTO McAfee
- Erase and rewind: the EU and privacy
- My email address is [CENSORED]
- Is there such a thing as a secure tablet?
- 2011: The year in news
- BYOD: Old or new, good or bad?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Ubuntu vs. Windows 7 on the business desktop
- York researchers heat storage to speed up data
- OneNote hits Google?s Android
- O2 trials Olympic-scale remote working
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Lenovo beats expectations again
- BlackBerry Bold 9790 review
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- Google to promise fairness after Motorola buy
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






our biggest headache
As someone who operates an online business, I have to say that any plans to reduce spam would be welcomed. Currently, spam filtering is one of our biggest headaches and time consuming. Not just from the point of maintaining network integrity, but to the other less obvious issues. This past year has seen a number of ISP’s taking steps to reduce spam to their customers, however, this has created a number of problems. Most notably that we now have to operate several email address because we have found that some accounts are being blocked by some ISP’s and others by others. Not to mention time spent sifting through the junk folder each day so as to ensure no legitimate emails are lost.
By dogsoldier on Tuesday Oct 13
There are tools, they just need to be used
More use of sender policy framework or domainkeys, means less scope for forged sender addresses. Also, more use of dynablock RBL would help, since most spam is "botpuke" direct from dynamic ips, and most legitimate mail will arrive via something that can be identified as a mailserver. Content scanning is NOT the answer, most newletters etc. will be classified as "spammy". Path tracking is the answer. Also, while it would be a good thing if ISPs ensure that deliberate or accidental abuse by their own users is detected and curtailed, you cannot eliminate all incompetent, unconcerned or downright spam-friendly hosts, so the problem needs to be dealt with on an incoming basis - outgoing is more a matter of reputation, as if your ISP is tagged as a trouble source, there are a good many sites you will be unwelcome at.
By Ip_nonsense574f8 on Tuesday Oct 13