RSA 2009: Security companies should share threat data
By Asavin Wattanajantra,
Security companies should share data on malware and other malicious threats, but it will take time and effort to make this happen.
This is according to Gerhard Eschelbeck, chief technology officer at Webroot, who said that security companies should anonymously share threat data and information on new malware.
Speaking to IT PRO at the RSA Conference, he said that security companies did share some data, but it was only done on an ad hoc basis when researchers from the industry happened to know each other.
“It’s a technically difficult problem that needs infrastructure and work, so it’s clear what people are expected to share,” said Eschelbeck.
It could be problematic as IT security competing companies would have made their own significant investments in infrastructure and their own ways of gathering threat data.
“At the same time, every company has made investments there,” he observed. “For the overall health of the internet there is anonymous agreement that it makes sense to share data, as long it’s not personally identifiable and limited to threat data.”
Eschelbeck said that the idea of security companies sharing threat data was in its infancy and needed a lot more discussion and refinement.
“Before we even go into the technical implementation, the first thing that would need to happen is to put a framework in place on what’s expected and what to do,” he said.
Eschelbeck didn’t believe that it would be realistic to expect a security vendor to drive this kind of initiative, and that there had to be a third party to kick things off.
“A good example was raised of a similar effort from the AMTSO (Anti Malware Testing Standards Organisation). Multiple vendors came together to solve the problem of how to test malware products with each other, which is a similar challenge," he explained.
“This not only has the vendor side but also the tester side, and these guys are meeting regularly in order to define a framework and process on how to share information on how to test malware products,” he said. “An organisation like AMTSO could take a role in defining a framework.”
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
What is your password worth?
Would you be tempted to sell off company passwords for a fee? If not, seems like you're in the minority, acccording to research.
- Macs under attack?
- Intel: security inside
- Are you spending too much on IT security?
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Eurocrats versus the cyber criminals
- The truth about spam
- Google and privacy: What’s the problem?
- Q&A: Symantec’s CISO on the source code hack
- RSA: Back from the breach?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





