Rogue trader warns financial systems need controls
By Asavin Wattanajantra,
Nick Leeson, the trader responsible for the fall of Barings Bank, has said that poor information systems will mean another similar financial scandal will happen again.
Leeson, speaking at the RSA Conference in London, was responsible for the fall of Barings Bank over 14 years ago by losing more than £800 million through rogue trading activities.
He said that the scandal would never have happened if the institution had adequate systems in place that would have flagged up his activities over the three-year period.
In the UK, government regulation needed to be strengthened, which would lead to businesses and regulators having improved access to information, according Leeson.
“I think that’s the challenge for anyone involved in the world of IT," he said. “Developing a system that has all the information, is able to disseminate the information, and see where there are difficulties."
“Have we learned our lessons from previous financial scandals? My answer would be is that I don’t think so.”
Leeson referred back to his time at Barings Bank by saying that if systems and controls were better and and didn't depend on people, he would not have been able to follow the path he went down.
“While I appreciate that it is difficult to completely remove the human involvement, I do believe that there are opportunities through the use of an effective real-time management system to mitigate their influence,” he said.
Leeson said that anybody in the IT department of Barings, who he sent the trades back to, could have prevented what was happening.
Though he criticised systems that were in place, Leeson still took full responsibility for what happened, and admitted that he was a criminal who deserved to go to jail for what he did.
Edward Gibson, chief security advisor for Microsoft in the UK, said to Leeson: “I hope that by you speaking about what happened, anyone who has any thoughts about engaging in that activity will stop and think twice about what happened to you."
“I take my hat off to you for talking about the lack of controls, and we have to take a look at that no matter what field we are involved in, whether it be technology or otherwise," Gibson added.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
What is your password worth?
Would you be tempted to sell off company passwords for a fee? If not, seems like you're in the minority, acccording to research.
- Macs under attack?
- Intel: security inside
- Are you spending too much on IT security?
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Eurocrats versus the cyber criminals
- The truth about spam
- Google and privacy: What’s the problem?
- Q&A: Symantec’s CISO on the source code hack
- RSA: Back from the breach?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





