Hung parliament could threaten digital Britain
By Jennifer Scott,
Britain’s policy on rolling out broadband could be in trouble if the upcoming election leaves us with a widely predicted hung parliament.
This is the belief of Anthony Walker, chief executive of the Broadband Stakeholder Group, an industry and government forum dedicated to this subject area.
During a Westminster forum, Walker pointed out the two different approaches towards broadband held by the Labour and Conservative parties.
“We now have two quite different roadmaps for broadband,” he said. “There is the Labour industrial activism approach, which I call the nuts and bolts... and the heart of that is that we know there is a problem coming up [with not enough people being served by broadband] and should take action now.”
“The Conservative approach is very different... it looks at the market mechanism, looking for new market entry [and to] grow the value of the market in the hope that the market exceeds the expectations that we expect today and actually delivers more.”
“That policy says lets worry about rural areas later and make this market dynamic as we can.”
The result of the next election would define which path to follow but Walker warned the whole issue could be brought to a halt if we end up with hung parliament.
“However, if there is real political uncertainty [hung parliament] then questions will be raised... and could put it back years.”
However, Walker ended on a positive note, listing elements of broadband policy that we can deal with now such as local projects, digital inclusion and discussing the universal service commitment of 2Mbps.
“I think there are reasons to be gloomy that we are still here and still debating the same issues [but] there are political [elements] we need to expect,” he concluded.
You may also like...
advertisement
Latest Industry & Public Sector Features
What impact will the browser ballot screen have?
The browser ballot screen is rolling out across Windows Update. Simon Brew charts its problems, the road to here, and what impact it’s likely to have.
- Q&A: Mark Kingdon on Second Life for business
- Q&A: The ID card commissioner talks cards and controversy
- The past, present and future of the Digital Economy Bill
- Google’s fight for its book deal
- MWC 2010: Top 10 show tech
- FreeBSD and the GPL
- Top 10 technologies for SMBs
- How much is space worth to Britain?
- Smartphones vs netbooks vs tablets - which is best for you?
Latest Industry & Public Sector Reviews
NEC MultiSync LCD4215 review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Your Views: Google Street View across the UK
- Reviews round-up: Windows Phone 7 and Firefox Mobile
- Q&A: Conrad Wolfram on communicating with apps in Web 3.0
- Why is Microsoft accelerating Service Pack 1?
- Palm 'disapointed' by results, Pre sales
- Google updates Chrome, awards security bonus
- Report: Macs cost less to run than Windows PCs
- A guide to BlackBerry Messenger 5.0
- Windows Phone 7 review ? hands on
- HTC Legend review
Latest News Videos in Industry & Public Sector
Video: What a connected classroom looks like
Dell unveils its vision for the classroom of the future, with netbooks, video conferencing and pub quiz-style handsets.
Whitepapers
Want more background on today's hottest IT trends?
Visit IT PRO's whitepaper library for more on virtualisation, encryption and other topics.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Hung Parliament maybe good
Maybe a hung Parliament will instead produce more discussion, more consultation, and a better resolution of issues like this. Anthony Walker hasn't got any axe to grind by any chance has he?
By 6tricky9 on Friday Nov 27
If it kills the levy, GOOD!
Broadband is NOT AN ESSENTIAL, the idea that it is, and needs to be avaiable to all, merely creates a different group of have-nots. Many that could have broadband now, don't have it, so it makes little sense to set grand targets of "available to all".
By Ip_nonsense574f8 on Saturday Nov 28
Dumb and Dumber!
The problem with the current and proposed approaches is the apparent naivity of the Government to the motivations of businesses. Businesses single overiding motivation is to make lots of money - they don't care about customers or staff, they barely bat an eyelid at regulators, they only make an effort to study relevant legislation mostly to look for relevant loopholes. Businesses have no built in Ethical or Moral constraints to prevent them from breaking the law or ignoring all considerations beyond their own needs. Any proposal involving voluntary efforts on the part of businesses is doomed to fail. No business will provide or contrib ute to a free service that might undermine their own services. No business is going to make it easy for a public service to be established. Business will seek to milk technology for as long as possible before replacing it. Just look at how long the Standard Analogue landline phone service has been around when it could have been replaced by a digital voip style service or a mobile only service. I believe the only way to go forward is to radically alter the model with which telecom networks and media services are provided. The government should forceably split each company providing a service with inphastructure such as BT, Virgin and the big four mobile networks. The inphrastructure from all these companies should be consolidated and merged into a single network providing all services. All the companies providing services who have lost their respective networks should then be compelled to operate as VNO or Mobile VNO - Virtual Network Operators - much the way Virgin's Mobile network and several other networks currently operate. The Inphrastructure company shall be at least 51% publically owned, with the balance being equally or proportionally owned by the telecoms and media service companies. Efforts to consolidate the mobile networks should result in much higher capacities allowing more users, and higher bandwidths in addition to the potential decomissioning or relocation of some towers to improve coverage in more isolated areas. Efforts to increase performance, capacity and introduce next generation capabilities such as fibre to the door and utilising higher speed transceivers and provide bonded lines to overcome present limitations can be more easily achieved with one company. Such a company might then also be able to provide a public 2MBps service, and this would force the VNO/MVNO's to operate on a more competative basis especially since the prices for access to the imphrastructure would be set the same for all VNO's MVNO's so the basis of competativity would have to be based more on features than price.
By Hitman101 on Wednesday Dec 2
debating hung parliament
I think a hung parliament is a possibility. There is loads of useful news about it on www.charter2010.co.uk
By vickyken on Friday Jan 15