Google Chrome OS review: First Look

By Benny Har-Even,
Rating:
In use
On our test laptop it took us a consistent 21 seconds to get from the launch of the virtual machine to the base Chrome OS splash screen. While that’s not quite the seven seconds Google promised, that’s not bad considering this is a very early build running in a virtual machine. Windows 7’s 50 seconds or so for a cold boot can’t really compete with that.
Getting to the splash screen though is undramatic with no boot logo to distract or waste resources. You go straight from a black screen to a simple blue screen (not the Windows sort though).

At the splash screen you’re presented with two simple boxes for username and password and your Gmail account details will get you in. If you don’t already have a Google Account, you’ll need to go and get one, though if you’re not already a Gmail user you’ll have to wonder why you’re trying this.
From here you’ll find yourself logged immediately into your Gmail account. As Google promised, the sense of OS is absent, it’s just login, and there's the browser.

If you’ve ever used Google’s Chrome browser, it will all look very familiar though there are some subtle differences. An icon just to the left of the first tab represents the Apps, and that’s what you’ll find when you click on it. The arrangement reminds us of Android at the moment but does look better and it states at the top that the ‘UI is under development’.
As Google promised all the apps are web apps. Gmail is obviously the first icon along with the other Google apps, but there are preloaded icons for getting to Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail too as well as Facebook and Twitter. Inevitably there’s a US bias at present and you won’t be able to get to Pandora or Hulu from the UK. There’s a ‘Get more’ option too, but that’s greyed out at present.

Apps such as the Calculator and To-Do list pop ups are attached to the bottom as ‘panels’ much like Google Talk currently is in Gmail.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Strategy News
Google tops Greenpeace Cool IT list
Greenpeace may be pleased with Google's progress, but the rest of the industry isn't doing enough, according to the pressure group.
Latest Strategy Analysis & Insight
Q&A: Daniel Reed, Reader's Digest
We spoke to the man in charge of the technology strategy for Reader’s Digest in Europe and Asia Pacific.
advertisement
Most popular
- Ubuntu vs. Windows 7 on the business desktop
- York researchers heat storage to speed up data
- BlackBerry Bold 9790 review
- OneNote hits Google?s Android
- O2 trials Olympic-scale remote working
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- Lenovo beats expectations again
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Google to promise fairness after Motorola buy
- Report: Google cloud storage coming soon
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Speed...
I installed it on my iMac under VMWare Fusion 3.0. It took around 12 seconds to boot on that (2.2Ghz C2D, 2GB RAM, with the VM having 768MB and both cores to play with). It was incredibly slow, I also have Ubuntu 9.10 in a VM (512MB RAM and 1 core allowed) and Firefox in Ubuntu flies compared to Chrome OS! So much for less code offering more speed! It is very picky in Fusion - as well as "bridged", I needed to specify which adapter, Automatic won't work! Also, if you forget to bridge or you don't select the adapter, you need to rebuild the VM. If Chrome OS doesn't find a working network on first boot, it will never find a working network, no matter what you do to the VM settings! I think I had to rebuild the VM 3 times before it found the network adapter. Chrome OS also seems to get confused if you jump out of the VM and come back again, a couple of times the Ctrl key got "stuck"... It is an interesting experiment, but I think it is ahead of its time, we need better network availability and more reliability. I like the cloud, but I wouldn't trust my data to it, alone. I use a hybrid. I have 3 machines I use regularly and they are all synchronised over the cloud, but the data doesn't sit only in the cloud. A web browser is fine, but some things (Email, chat, Twitter, Office etc.) are still better with "fat" clients. The Web experience needs to improve somewhat (and maybe move beyond HTML), before it will be an adequate replacement for ALL fat apps. For an easy to use web browser based machine, it will be fine. For full blooded working environments, it has a way to go - there an RDP or Citrix thin client is still a better bet...
By big_D on Friday Nov 27
ummm...
takes less than 4seconds for my system to load it. from time I press power to splash. I've only tried it on a fast machine and I also didn't need to set bridged adapter... it just worked. It is very, very limited and about the only time I'd ever use it as it stands - on a pc I mean - is if I was travelling and wanted to use a secured computer to access the internet - plug in the USB and go. Or if I want someone to use one of my computers with sensitive info to access the net only.
By IhamMhee on Friday Mar 19
Are we ready for this?
I'm still undecided. Check out my post for some more insight on ChromeOS: http://whatsnottaken.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/are-you-ready-for-chromium-os/
By bsilverop on Friday Jan 21
Looks interesting
http://whatsnottaken.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/are-you-ready-for-chromium-os/
By bsilverop on Sunday Jan 23