ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    Google Chrome OS review: First Look

< Previous   Strategy : Reviews Next >

4 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

Speed...

I installed it on my iMac under VMWare Fusion 3.0. It took around 12 seconds to boot on that (2.2Ghz C2D, 2GB RAM, with the VM having 768MB and both cores to play with). It was incredibly slow, I also have Ubuntu 9.10 in a VM (512MB RAM and 1 core allowed) and Firefox in Ubuntu flies compared to Chrome OS! So much for less code offering more speed! It is very picky in Fusion - as well as "bridged", I needed to specify which adapter, Automatic won't work! Also, if you forget to bridge or you don't select the adapter, you need to rebuild the VM. If Chrome OS doesn't find a working network on first boot, it will never find a working network, no matter what you do to the VM settings! I think I had to rebuild the VM 3 times before it found the network adapter. Chrome OS also seems to get confused if you jump out of the VM and come back again, a couple of times the Ctrl key got "stuck"... It is an interesting experiment, but I think it is ahead of its time, we need better network availability and more reliability. I like the cloud, but I wouldn't trust my data to it, alone. I use a hybrid. I have 3 machines I use regularly and they are all synchronised over the cloud, but the data doesn't sit only in the cloud. A web browser is fine, but some things (Email, chat, Twitter, Office etc.) are still better with "fat" clients. The Web experience needs to improve somewhat (and maybe move beyond HTML), before it will be an adequate replacement for ALL fat apps. For an easy to use web browser based machine, it will be fine. For full blooded working environments, it has a way to go - there an RDP or Citrix thin client is still a better bet...

By big_D on Friday Nov 27

4 people out of 5 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

ummm...

takes less than 4seconds for my system to load it. from time I press power to splash. I've only tried it on a fast machine and I also didn't need to set bridged adapter... it just worked. It is very, very limited and about the only time I'd ever use it as it stands - on a pc I mean - is if I was travelling and wanted to use a secured computer to access the internet - plug in the USB and go. Or if I want someone to use one of my computers with sensitive info to access the net only.

By IhamMhee on Friday Mar 19

2 people out of 2 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Are we ready for this?

I'm still undecided. Check out my post for some more insight on ChromeOS: http://whatsnottaken.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/are-you-ready-for-chromium-os/

By bsilverop on Friday Jan 21

0 people out of 0 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Looks interesting

http://whatsnottaken.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/are-you-ready-for-chromium-os/

By bsilverop on Sunday Jan 23

0 people out of 0 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

    You may also like...

 Sponsored Links

advertisement

    You may also like...

advertisement

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement