Facebook's Zuckerberg says people don't expect web privacy
By Martin James,
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has cranked up the heat on the privacy debate embroiling the social networking site by claiming that people no longer expect their details to be private.
Speaking to consumer technology site TechCrunch, Zuckerberg argued that a lack of privacy online had become the norm, and said Facebook had flourished so dramatically because he had predicted as much when it was still being thought up.
“People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people,” he told TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington. “That social norm is just something that has evolved over time.”
Last month Facebook overhauled its privacy structures, requiring members to reclassify which information they wanted to remain private. However, in doing so the social networking site was widely criticised for moving away from a position of keeping their information private to one actively encouraging sharing.
Privacy groups claimed the changes were in breach of US consumer protection laws, and called on the Federal Trade Commission to order Facebook to overturn them. The FTC has since argued that it's not really its place to advise on privacy policies.
With 350 million users, Facebook is the world's biggest social networking service, and as such is as much responsible for shaping trends as to responding to them. However, Zuckerberg disagrees, saying that Facebook's softening stance on privacy is simply a response to wider trends.
“When I got started in my dorm room at Harvard, the question a lot of people asked was: 'why would I want to put any information on the internet at all? Why would I want to have a website?'
“In the last 5 or 6 years, blogging has taken off in a huge way, and just all these different services that have people sharing all this information,” he said.
Facebook was founded in 2004 as a closed network for US college students, and started to gain true global appeal three years later as its massive potential began to be unlocked.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking Analysis & Insight
Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
Inside the Enterprise: The Government has warned of disruption, and the Civil Service is practising working from home. Could IT yet save businesses from chaos on an Olympian scale?
- Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
- It's not about the browser, stupid!
- The Great British network squeeze
- New year: new suppliers
- Top 10 tech winners and losers of 2011
- 2011: The year in news
- UK rural broadband: too little, and too late
- HP PCs back on the menu with Dellish plans
- Top 10 social networking tips for enterprise - part one
Latest Networking Reviews
Swyx SwyxExpress X20 review
Rating: ![]()
- Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold Premium 15
- ForeScout Technologies CounterACT 6.3.4
- ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- TITUS Aware for Microsoft Outlook review
- Windows Phone 7 Mango review: First Look
- Dartware InterMapper review
- Kemp Technologies LoadMaster 3600 review
- Sangfor WANACC M5500 review
- Office 365 review: First look
advertisement
Most popular
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- Symantec hackers: We've released pcAnywhere source code
- BT considering Ofcom price cap appeal
- Google sends in Bouncer to sort out malicious apps
- ACTA: the basics, the controversies, and the future
- Trendnet firmware flaw exposes private videos
- Anonymous publishes FBI hacking call
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7
- VeriSign admits 2010 hack
- Nokia Lumia 710 review
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.




You and who's army?
I'd much rather my details were private by default, and then allowed me to open them up as I see fit. Which means I totally disagree with Mark Zuckerberg; privacy is extremely important to humans, and the rise in social networking has lead to a massive rise in all kinds onf data being freely available (whic- sadly- most people probably aren't even aware of).
By rjthomas on Tuesday Jan 12
How much is too much!
A short while ago I attempted to close my facebook account and remove all of my details from public availability and realised I couldn’t. This is unacceptable. As someone who has lived through the harrowing ordeal of a real life stalker. Social networks are great places, however, they are also incredibly dangerous for the unwary. Though I do believe people themselves should take some responsibility for what information they make available, not everyone is as aware of what can happen when careless with there details however Zuckerberg should know better! , I have to say that his statements are ill-informed and naive at best
By dogsoldier on Tuesday Jan 12