Gary McKinnon wins another reprieve with judicial review
By Nicole Kobie,
The saga of Gary McKinnon is set to continue, as his lawyer has won the right to a High Court review of his pending extradition to the US to stand trial for hacking charges.
The judicial review will examine Home Secretary Alan Johnson's claim that he could not intervene in the case and prevent the extradition.
While McKinnon admits hacking into Pentagon and NASA computers, he denies the level of damage claimed and is said to be at risk of suicide because of his Asperger's Syndrome.
The judicial review will consider if Johnson's decision not to halt the extradition was correct. It is set to take place in April or May, with McKinnon allowed to stay in the UK until then.
McKinnon's lawyer Karen Todner said in a statement: "I would urge Mr Johnson to review his decision, and I appeal to [American President Barack] Obama to withdraw the application for extradition. Mr McKinnon's suffering has gone on long enough."
McKinnon's mother Janis Sharp expressed her relief over Twitter. "We're so pleased and the sense of relief is indescribable," she wrote, later adding: "Couldn't stop crying when heard the news. Gary says he's still in shock."
Sharp and McKinnon's other supporters are currently running a texting and download campaign to put pressure on the Government.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
What is your password worth?
Would you be tempted to sell off company passwords for a fee? If not, seems like you're in the minority, acccording to research.
- Macs under attack?
- Intel: security inside
- Are you spending too much on IT security?
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Eurocrats versus the cyber criminals
- The truth about spam
- Google and privacy: What’s the problem?
- Q&A: Symantec’s CISO on the source code hack
- RSA: Back from the breach?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






The 52nd state?
How will the UK in the end respond to the USA for AFAIK we are the undeclared 52nd state of theirs? I mean when Alabama (if I recall) had quibbles about alcohol drinking age the Federal Government cut off their road funding for that year. Now what will the US do to the UK if we don't do 'as they say'?
Michael
By searcher_n3 on Thursday Jan 14
Under the thumb
Tony Blair sold the British people down the river with this extradtion treaty. It's totally one sided. The US snap their fingers and one of us is sent over there. Try extraditing a US citizen! I don't have time for hackers and I'm not anti-American but the governments duty is to it's own citiens first and allies second.
By RussV on Friday Jan 15
Yet more money ...
... for the legal industry!
Most of the comments on this story are either:
1 complaints about the extradition treaty wth the US;
2 playing the Aspergers card.
Well
1 if you don't like the treaty, write to your MP, newspapers, television; campaign to get it changed;
2 his Aspergers can't be too serious as it was only diagnosed after he committed the acts, and was convicted.
His lawyer says "Mr McKinnon's suffering has gone on long enough". Why then is she prolonging it? The case has been refused twice already. Let him go to stand trial.
The only winners here are the legal industry. And who is paying them?
By KeyWorker on Friday Jan 15