Innocent users accused of illegal file sharing
By Maggie Holland,
A number of web users have been sent letters by a law firm suggesting they've been involved in illegal file sharing, despite the users protesting their innocence.
So claims Which? Computing which has been approached by more than 150 people who've received letters threatening them with legal action and offering the opportunity to settle out of court for their alleged wrong doing for the sum of £500.
"My 78 year-old father yesterday received a letter from ACS law demanding £500 for a porn file he is alleged to have downloaded," one such user who contacted Which? Computing said. "He doesn’t even know what file sharing or bittorrent is so has certainly not done this himself or given anyone else permission to use his computer to do such a thing."
A number of people are being falsely accused of committing file sharing acts that not only have they not carried out, but wouldn't know how to, according to Which? technology editor Matt Bath.
"Which? is concerned that many people will be frightened into paying up rather than facing the stress of a court battle. Over 150 people have turned to Which? for help already. We’d like to see an end to these letters being sent to innocent people and encourage copyright owners to focus their attention on those who are continually breaking the law."
IT PRO contacted ACS:Law for comment but it had not responded to our request at the time of publication.
"We are happy that the information we get is completely accurate," ACS:Law's Andrew Crossley, told the BBC.
"We explain that an infringement has taken place but it may not be the account holder who has done it."
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking Analysis & Insight
Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
Inside the Enterprise: The Government has warned of disruption, and the Civil Service is practising working from home. Could IT yet save businesses from chaos on an Olympian scale?
- Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
- It's not about the browser, stupid!
- The Great British network squeeze
- New year: new suppliers
- Top 10 tech winners and losers of 2011
- 2011: The year in news
- UK rural broadband: too little, and too late
- HP PCs back on the menu with Dellish plans
- Top 10 social networking tips for enterprise - part one
Latest Networking Reviews
Swyx SwyxExpress X20 review
Rating: ![]()
- Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold Premium 15
- ForeScout Technologies CounterACT 6.3.4
- ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- TITUS Aware for Microsoft Outlook review
- Windows Phone 7 Mango review: First Look
- Dartware InterMapper review
- Kemp Technologies LoadMaster 3600 review
- Sangfor WANACC M5500 review
- Office 365 review: First look
advertisement
Most popular
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- Symantec hackers: We've released pcAnywhere source code
- BT considering Ofcom price cap appeal
- Google sends in Bouncer to sort out malicious apps
- ACTA: the basics, the controversies, and the future
- Trendnet firmware flaw exposes private videos
- Anonymous publishes FBI hacking call
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7
- VeriSign admits 2010 hack
- Nokia Lumia 710 review
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






ANDREW CROSSLEY, ACS Law
As the owner and operator of ACS:Law Solicitors, I can confirm that I have no record of having been contacted by anyone from IT Pro. If I was aware of such communication I would have made contact. Thank you.
By AndrewCrossleyofACSLAW on Sunday Apr 4
Now who am I going to believe?
The lawyer who chased people for crimes they didn't commit, or the well-respected technology publication? I'll give you a clue; it's not the one who could also be described as a shark.
By Anonymous_Gamer on Wednesday Feb 2