ICANN: Most web domain registrations are faulty
By Martin James,
Three out of every four web domains is registered with information that is either false or incomplete, according to domain oversight body ICANN.
The organisation has just released a 35-page report (PDF) into the accuracy of WHOIS registrant contact information, and just 23 per cent of the 1,419 records sampled were found to be completely accurate, although around double that amount met a slightly relaxed version of the criteria.
In compiling the report, ICANN looked at an internationally representative sample of records across five generic top level domains (.com, .org, .net. .info and .biz).
In each case, the address was checked against postal records and mapping data for deliverability, searches were conducted in phone listings for a link between name and address, and contact was attempted with the named registrant using the supplied phone number.
And while it found that many oversights were clearly innocent, ICANN said it was clear that some applicants had no intention of being completely accurate. “There is no question that there are people who register domains without disclosing their full or real identity,” the report said.
“While we didn’t find any cases where an identity had been stolen... given the latitude that people have in choosing what information to provide when registering a domain name, identity theft may not be necessary; it is all too easy for registrants to enter any or no name, along with an unreliable or undeliverable address.”
The report also concluded that it would be hard to guarantee a higher degree of accuracy without passing some costs on to the consumer: “The cost of ensuring accuracy will escalate with the level of accuracy sought, and ultimately the cost of increased accuracy would be passed through to the registrants in the fees they pay to register a domain.”
ICANN has opened a 60-day public comment on the report, at the end of which it will prepare a summary analysis of the submissions received.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking Analysis & Insight
Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
Inside the Enterprise: The Government has warned of disruption, and the Civil Service is practising working from home. Could IT yet save businesses from chaos on an Olympian scale?
- Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
- It's not about the browser, stupid!
- The Great British network squeeze
- New year: new suppliers
- Top 10 tech winners and losers of 2011
- 2011: The year in news
- UK rural broadband: too little, and too late
- HP PCs back on the menu with Dellish plans
- Top 10 social networking tips for enterprise - part one
Latest Networking Reviews
Swyx SwyxExpress X20 review
Rating: ![]()
- Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold Premium 15
- ForeScout Technologies CounterACT 6.3.4
- ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- TITUS Aware for Microsoft Outlook review
- Windows Phone 7 Mango review: First Look
- Dartware InterMapper review
- Kemp Technologies LoadMaster 3600 review
- Sangfor WANACC M5500 review
- Office 365 review: First look
advertisement
Most popular
- Google releases Chrome for Android beta
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- OneNote hits Google?s Android
- BlackBerry Bold 9790 review
- Google sends in Bouncer to sort out malicious apps
- Ubuntu vs. Windows 7 on the business desktop
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7
- ACTA: the basics, the controversies, and the future
- BT considering Ofcom price cap appeal
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.



