Head to Head: Office 2010 vs Open Office 3.1
It's a tie. Although Microsoft’s baby comes out fighting here and nearly edges it.
With its attractive, innovative design and richly supported feature set, the proprietary product represents the pinnacle of corporate functionality and while it remains the choice of so many current businesses it will continue to be adopted across the corporate world and the revenue it generates will fund further innovation and depth of support. It simply can’t be beaten for functionality and popularity, a feature that is so often the deciding factor in business. As we mentioned though, potential adopters would do well to sit and assess the realistic need for upgrade before making the jump.
It’s owing to this fact that Open Office manages to get a look-in. For basic usability and value the suite represents a sensible choice for small business users who don’t want to sacrifice capability because of cost. The only investment you’ll need to roll this out across your entire office will be time and a little effort and we feel that this coupled with the stable, useful nature of Open Office entitles it to a joint place on the podium.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest PDF Software News
Another Adobe zero day strikes
Adobe Acrobat and Reader are affected by the critical vulnerability, as the software maker scrambles to issue a fix.
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





This is not exactly a fair comparison!
Why have you reviewed a BETA of office 2010 while using the previous version of OpenOffice - version 3.2 of OpenOffice has been available since the 11 February?
This pretty much makes the whole review pointless!
By iotola on Friday Feb 26
Comparison
@iotola Thanks for your comment. The review and testing period was, in the main, carried out pre Feb 11th. Then, when 3.2 came along, our reviewer looked into the changes and deemed them fairly minimal in the scheme of the overall comparison (we were not going into enough detail to test out (password encrypted XML files and Chinese language additions) in this instance.
While Office 2010 is still in beta stage, it's advanced enough for us to get a feel for what will be included in the final release. And we make it clear we are comparing the beta with Open Office, rather than a final version.
Maggie Holland, Editor
By Ip_maggie_hollan on Friday Feb 26
Relevance of the comparison?
Comparison is easy and results are as expected. MS Office (any variant) is commercial, platform constrained, but polished, and feature rich with few bugs. Open office is free, is platform independent, is rough around the edges and yet still can fulfil 99% of user needs. This review could have been written yesterday, or be churned out again tomorrow... situation will not change. I have not used MS Office for 7 years, Open Office has improved every year, and I am sure likewise so has MS Office. BUT the reason MS Office is improving is Open Office.
By saiftynet on Sunday Feb 28
A very lightweight review
I struggle to see the point of this review. Am I really expected to make a business decision on the basis of this? Where are the comparisons of actual features, head-to-head tests on time taken to achieve the same task, etc, etc? Instead it seems very dismissive and goes with the easy option every time. Not exactly a good advertisement for IT Pro.
By Ip_john91da3b20a on Tuesday Mar 2
Updated comparison
This comparison has been updated since the first version.
For reference, the test machine used was running Windows 7 x64, with an Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and 4GB of RAM so while speed comparisons have been included, these should only be used as a rough guide.
Maggie Holland, Editor
By Ip_maggie_hollan on Saturday Mar 13
Windows 7?
You tested it on Windows 7? It isn't compatible, according to Open Offices website:
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_30.html
How dozy is that!?
By itproxy on Tuesday Mar 16
OO 3.2 on WIndows 7 - fine!
OO 3.2 on WIndows 7 - works fine for me! I like it and avoid using Office 2007 (also installed) if I possibly can.
By WestNab on Tuesday Mar 16
I never liked both anyway.
They are both a non starter for me. They both need an operating system to run on {Java / .NET} that eats up all your resources and slows down your system to a crawl. :x
Have you ever considered SSuite Office as a free alternative?
Their software doesn't need to run on Java or .NET, so it makes their software very small, efficient, and easy to use. I just love free software that works. :)
By BeBob_Esq on Thursday Mar 18
openoffice 3.2
I was disappointed with OpenOffice 3.2. Oracle ruined writer so that the table function works correctly.
By larrydes on Friday Jan 28
openoffice 3.2
I mis-typed. writer table does NOT work correctly.
By larrydes on Friday Jan 28
comparison
I used Office Beta until it expired, but cannot afford to upgrade at the present. I liked openoffice 3.1 butnot 3.2. I found an openoffice portable which works better than 3.2.
By larrydes on Friday Jan 28