Head to Head: Office 2010 vs Open Office 3.1

By Tony Crammond,
In this head to head we are focussing on the two most popular suites of office software on the market today. While some people consider the comparison a little one sided, we thought it was time to give Open Office a chance to stand up to the heavyweight that is Microsoft’s 20-year old Office, in its latest beta incarnation.
Some may suggest this is a David and Goliath-esque battle as Open Office recently celebrated its 100 millionth download since version 3.0 was made available and Microsoft Office is believed to be used by more than 500 million people worldwide. But we have chosen these two big-hitters because of the wealth of support and features available. We’d also like to offer a nod to Google Docs, a suite we see as a potential contender for the future, when it will make up part of the upcoming Chrome OS.
While we recognise that many businesses might not be in a position to rip out and replace their previous Microsoft infrastructure, particularly if they’ve invested heavily in it over the years, the purpose of this comparison is to outline the key points in Office 2010 and Open Office’s favour.
Smaller businesses with fewer tech assets and perhaps less legacy kit, those looking to set up a new department and trial something new before reporting back, for example, may be intrigued by open source alternatives to Office but not quite sure what’s in it for them.
This comparison tries to answer those questions.
NB: At the time of review, Microsoft’s Office 2010 suite was still in beta, but showcased the majority of the plus points the full version will offer. Following the review period, Open Office 3.2 was released offering a few more features that have not been compared or explored in this comparison due to the fact that the entire review compared version 3.1 and the Office 2010 beta in depth. Our intention is to compare the latest version of Open Office and Office 2010 again when the final Microsoft product is released later this year.
User interface
Both offerings have been lauded for their user interface (UI) in the past, albeit for different reasons and these incarnations aim to continue that trend.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest PDF Software News
Another Adobe zero day strikes
Adobe Acrobat and Reader are affected by the critical vulnerability, as the software maker scrambles to issue a fix.
advertisement
Most popular
- Ubuntu vs. Windows 7 on the business desktop
- York researchers heat storage to speed up data
- OneNote hits Google?s Android
- O2 trials Olympic-scale remote working
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Lenovo beats expectations again
- BlackBerry Bold 9790 review
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- Google to promise fairness after Motorola buy
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.





This is not exactly a fair comparison!
Why have you reviewed a BETA of office 2010 while using the previous version of OpenOffice - version 3.2 of OpenOffice has been available since the 11 February? This pretty much makes the whole review pointless!
By iotola on Friday Feb 26
Comparison
@iotola Thanks for your comment. The review and testing period was, in the main, carried out pre Feb 11th. Then, when 3.2 came along, our reviewer looked into the changes and deemed them fairly minimal in the scheme of the overall comparison (we were not going into enough detail to test out (password encrypted XML files and Chinese language additions) in this instance. While Office 2010 is still in beta stage, it's advanced enough for us to get a feel for what will be included in the final release. And we make it clear we are comparing the beta with Open Office, rather than a final version. Maggie Holland, Editor
By Ip_maggie_hollan on Friday Feb 26
Relevance of the comparison?
Comparison is easy and results are as expected. MS Office (any variant) is commercial, platform constrained, but polished, and feature rich with few bugs. Open office is free, is platform independent, is rough around the edges and yet still can fulfil 99% of user needs. This review could have been written yesterday, or be churned out again tomorrow... situation will not change. I have not used MS Office for 7 years, Open Office has improved every year, and I am sure likewise so has MS Office. BUT the reason MS Office is improving is Open Office.
By saiftynet on Sunday Feb 28
A very lightweight review
I struggle to see the point of this review. Am I really expected to make a business decision on the basis of this? Where are the comparisons of actual features, head-to-head tests on time taken to achieve the same task, etc, etc? Instead it seems very dismissive and goes with the easy option every time. Not exactly a good advertisement for IT Pro.
By Ip_john91da3b20a on Tuesday Mar 2
Updated comparison
This comparison has been updated since the first version. For reference, the test machine used was running Windows 7 x64, with an Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 and 4GB of RAM so while speed comparisons have been included, these should only be used as a rough guide. Maggie Holland, Editor
By Ip_maggie_hollan on Saturday Mar 13
Windows 7?
You tested it on Windows 7? It isn't compatible, according to Open Offices website: http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_30.html How dozy is that!?
By itproxy on Tuesday Mar 16
OO 3.2 on WIndows 7 - fine!
OO 3.2 on WIndows 7 - works fine for me! I like it and avoid using Office 2007 (also installed) if I possibly can.
By WestNab on Tuesday Mar 16
I never liked both anyway.
They are both a non starter for me. They both need an operating system to run on {Java / .NET} that eats up all your resources and slows down your system to a crawl. :x Have you ever considered SSuite Office as a free alternative? Their software doesn't need to run on Java or .NET, so it makes their software very small, efficient, and easy to use. I just love free software that works. :)
By BeBob_Esq on Thursday Mar 18
openoffice 3.2
I was disappointed with OpenOffice 3.2. Oracle ruined writer so that the table function works correctly.
By larrydes on Friday Jan 28
openoffice 3.2
I mis-typed. writer table does NOT work correctly.
By larrydes on Friday Jan 28
comparison
I used Office Beta until it expired, but cannot afford to upgrade at the present. I liked openoffice 3.1 butnot 3.2. I found an openoffice portable which works better than 3.2.
By larrydes on Friday Jan 28