Public internet access: who is responsible?
By Stephen Pritchard,
IT departments might want to create lists of banned ports, for example allowing the internet, or even voice over IP, but blocking FTP and “torrent” sites. This should be in addition to any web content filtering technology, and the proper deployment of firewalls.
As Reeves points out, some services, including those that distribute illegal content, are now quite adept at hiding behind commonly used ports such as port 80, so firewalls that can look inside the packets themselves. “Canny security people set up firewalls so they can look inside the packets, and figure out what the traffic is,” he says.
But simply segregating traffic, or scanning it at the technical level, is not enough to protect a company from possible legal action, nor to protect its bandwidth. According to Quocirca’s Longbottom, at the very least companies need to have acceptable usage policies for guest access, wired or wireless.
“For legality's sake, it is always best to give out some T&Cs, on-line, so that you can verify that at least they were put in front of the user,” he says.
“Also, if a user were to get a virus from your network, then they may have a case against you, if you gave them express permission to use the network. So, make clear in the T&Cs that it is buyer beware.”
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking News
Unifed comms confusion blights adoption, research shows
Survey shows CIOs are reluctant to invest because of concerns over costs and deployment.
Latest Networking Tutorials
Internet Explorer 8 in action
As the Internet Explorer 8 release candidate becomes available to download Mary Branscombe looks at what your users are going to be making support calls about, from rich search results to anonymous browsing.
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Latest Analysis & Insight Videos in Networking
Q&A: Mikko Hyppönen, chief research officer, F-Secure
We ask one of the leading experts on cyber crime for an assessment of the recent spate of cyber attacks and the growing threats to companies...






We need a universal service
To some extent we already have the answer. BT has been promoting BT FON for some time.
I like many others have created a 512k BT Openzone access on my home hub. It is available quickly for me when I need a quick temporary wireless setup (don't have to remember the WPA key) and provides a community of mutual wifi users.
There is no bigger frustration than arriving at Burger King or a pub and having to request a password from someone who hasn't a clue what you are talking about. In McDonalds you have to go through a registration process by which time my big MAC has gone cold. This all needs management that no doubt costs.
It has to be a lot less hassle and cheaper for business premises to utilise something like BT FON.
The network use is then between the consumer and BT FON whilst still providing a service to encourage trade.
Wouldn't it be great to get wifi access anywhere using the same User ID. A service worth paying a small fee for. (BT Total Braodband includes some free Openzone minutes).
If not BT FON something very similar with cross agreements between the hotspot providers which sadly went sour.
By meadmodj on Monday Jun 7