'Supertaskers' can safely use mobiles while driving
By Martin James,
A University of Utah study into the effects of mobile phone use on people's driving skills has come to the expected conclusion that using a phone while driving can be highly dangerous.
Or at least that's the case for most of us. The study also made the entirely unexpected discovery that for one in 40 of us, there were no signs of impairment whatsoever.
University psychologists Jason Watson and David Strayer tested 200 subjects in two motorway driving simulation tests, one of which also involved having a hands-free mobile phone conversation that required them to memorise words and solve maths equations.
For the vast majority of the test subjects, the researchers recorded an average 20 per cent increase in braking response time, a 30 per cent increase in following distance, an 11 per cent drop in memory performance and a three per cent drop in the ability to do maths problems.
However, the five 'supertaskers' not only showed no appreciable difference in following distance, braking time and maths ability, but remarkably they actually displayed a three per cent improvement to memory performance.
“According to cognitive theory, these individuals ought not to exist,” Watson says in a statement. “Yet, clearly they do, so we use the 'supertasker' term as a convenient way to describe their exceptional multitasking ability.”
However, with the study likely to be taken as justification for self-proclaimed 'supertaskers' to continue to take risks by using their mobiles while driving, Watson had a word of caution.
“Given the number of individuals who routinely talk on the phone while driving, one would have hoped that there would be a greater percentage of supertaskers,” he commented.
The findings will be published later this year in the Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
In the UK, the penalities issued to those who risk their own lives and the lives of others by using a mobile at the wheel have been toughened.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Mobile Analysis & Insight
Citrix takes on the mobile cloud at Synergy
Citrix’s annual gathering saw numerous product announcements clustered around the dual themes of mobility and cloud
- Bring you own device: the $600 question
- Shanghai surprise: Counterfeit technology in China
- 4G edges closer
- Apple's new iPad doesn't give users a choice
- Government IT: Apples for the mandarins
- Mobile comms: coffee and TV
- Rolling out iPads in the enterprise
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
- What should RIM do to recapture the attention of businesses?
Latest Mobile Reviews
Amazon Kindle Touch review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Latest News Videos in Mobile
IT PRO Podcast: CES 2011
In the first podcast of 2011, we talk with Adam Griffin of Dell and Barry Collins of PCPro about tablets, the cloud and all the other exciting...
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Mobile Phone Use and Driving
It would be interesting to study how well helicopter pilots would do in this test. Bearing mind that the workload of a helicopter pilot must be about a factor of ten greater than a car driver on a motorway, they ought to do fairly well. I speak from personal experience, as a qualified helicopter and fixed-wing pilot, who finds motorway driving so boring that it almost becomes dangerous.
By AdrianMarch on Saturday Apr 3
Against The Supertasker
"Finding the activity driving boring"[sic] is one of the recognised dangers of controlling any vehicle. As a professional, one is expected to take this into account and overcome the effects. To suggest that it is somehow acceptable to permit some form of distraction as a way of warding off a micro-sleep incident is disingenuous at best.
There needs to be no insinuation that there are caveats. Using devices other than those for direct vehicle control, while driving poses risk. As that risk potentialises injury, or loss of life, it is totally unacceptable to suggest that it is somehow "O.K. If I'm good enough."
By Auracious on Friday May 7