ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    Most of Fortune 500 hit by Zeus trojan

An RSA Security study has discovered that 88 per cent of the biggest companies in the US have potentially been compromised by keylogging malware.

By Martin James, 15 Apr 2010 at 12:35

security

Nearly 90 per cent of Fortune 500 companies in the US have potentially been affected by the Zeus trojan, according to an RSA Security study released yesterday.

The security firm's FraudAction Anti-Trojan division analysed data stolen by Zeus from infected computers in August, reports CNET. After tracing the data back to individual IP and email addresses, RSA was able to identify the source of the computers used in the Zeus botnet.

“Domains individually representing 88 per cent of the Fortune 500 were shown to have been accessed to some extent by computers infected by the Zeus trojan,” the study revealed.

RSA added that when it analysed the compromised data it found on the websites used as dumping grounds for data stolen by Zeus, it found compromised email addresses for three out of five Fortune 500 firms.

The report also noted that it didn't even look at around 20 consumer-facing brands such as Google, due to the huge volume of data these sites already have on the web.

Zeus was first identified in 2007, and is still active today, with compromised computers having been found in a total of 196 countries.

RSA is the security division of IT giant EMC, itself a Fortune 500 company.

Email to a friend

Print this page

< Previous   Security : News Next >

1 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

Credibility

This would be a good article to read if it did not lack credibility. RSA is credible, but when one reads and article with blatant mis-spellings, such as "per cent" instead of percent, it really speaks volumes about the credibility, whether it is intentionally or, in this case, unintentionally done.

By Johnnyd4251 on Friday Apr 16

0 people out of 2 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

    You may also like...

 Sponsored Links

advertisement

    You may also like...

advertisement

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement