ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    US names and shames worst IP protectors

Canada joins 10 others in Special 301 worst-of-the-worst category.

By Martin James, 4 May 2010 at 16:44

Intellectual property

The US trade representative has singled out those countries it feels aren't pulling their weight in the battle to protect intellectual property rights.

Canada has once again been included in the top bracket of countries that need to do more to protect intellectual property (IP) rights in the US' annual Special 301 report.

The 2010 report names Canada alongside 10 other nations, including Russia and China, in the Priority Watch List of nations the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) feels don't sufficiently guard IP rights or that block US businesses that rely on copyright protection.

“Internet piracy is a significant concern with respect to a number of trading partners, including Brazil, Canada, China, India, Italy, Russia, Spain and Ukraine,” the report reads. Canada was singled out for having thus far failed to ratify the 1996 WIPO Internet Treaties covering, among other things, DRM laws.

“The United States urges Canada to enact legislation in the near term to update its copyright laws and address the challenge of internet piracy,” the report challenges. “Canada should fully implement the WIPO Internet Treaties, which it signed in 1997.@

It added: “Canada’s weak enforcement of intellectual property rights is also of concern, and the United States continues to encourage Canada to improve its IPR enforcement system to provide for deterrent sentences and stronger enforcement powers.”

Referring to China, the report highlighted “market access barriers” in the country that created “additional incentives to infringe products such as movies, video games, and books, and lead consumers to the black market, thereby compounding the severe problems already faced by China’s enforcement authorities”.

The full list of nations on the Priority Watch List are Algeria, Argentina, Canada, Chile, China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Russia, Thailand, and Venezuela, with a further 29 on the less critical Watch List.

Paraguay, meanwhile, was given the Section 306 Monitoring rating, indicating the USTR believes bilateral attention is needed to address the country's underlying IPR problems.

The combined total of 41 countries singled out for criticism is lower than in many previous years, and indeed the USTR praised some countries' efforts to combat piracy. Sweden was praised for developing legal alternatives to peer-to-peer networks like Spotify and Film2Home.

Email to a friend

Print this page

< Previous   Networking : News Next >

1 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

Who gains and who loses?

I guess as the biggest big budget movies, Microsoft, Apple bring money for the US Incorporated it may be seen as merely legitimately protecting one country's industrial efforts...fair enough. But when countries are blacklisted for encouraging competing products then that is wrong... see http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/feb/23/opensource-intellectual-property . IP protection within the law is fine, you may or not agree with it, but if this becomes a tool to prevent others seeking alternatives then it is morally unsound.

By saiftynet on Tuesday May 4

2 people out of 2 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

    You may also like...

 Sponsored Links

advertisement

    You may also like...

advertisement

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement