Google and AT&T taken to task by FCC over privacy breaches
By Martin James,
The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has raised concerns over recent high-profile privacy breaches involving two of the world's biggest technology firms.
Last week it emerged that a hacker group had infiltrated US carrier AT&T's systems and gained access to the records of 114,000 iPad users registered with the network.
This after last month's revelation that search giant Google's Street View cars had inadvertently scooped up hundreds of gigabytes worth of data from unsecured wireless networks while taking photos for the mapping service.
The iPad breach is already subject to FBI investigation while Google has taken considerable heat in other countries around the world, particularly Australia, not only for collecting the data in the first place, but also for its subsequent stalling in sharing exactly what information it had.
FCC chief of consumer and governmental affairs Joe Gurin says that in the light of these issues, the organisation was now treating cyber security “as a high priority”.
“The FCC's mission is to ensure that broadband networks are safe and secure, and we're committed to working with all stakeholders to prevent problems like this in the future.” Gurin wrote in a blog past over the weekend.
“The iPad incident appears to be a classic security breach – the kind that could happen, and has happened, to many companies – and is exactly the kind of incident that has led the FCC to focus on cyber security.”
The FBI has indicated it will investigate the AT&T breach, which saw phone numbers and email addresses exposed – including those of celebrities and high-ranking government officials.
Regarding Google and its Street View cars, Gurin said that the company was missing the point by arguing that it was accidental, and that it was breach of privacy either way.
“Google’s behaviour also raises important concerns. Whether intentional or not, collecting information sent over Wi-Fi networks clearly infringes on consumer privacy,” Gurin said.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
What is your password worth?
Would you be tempted to sell off company passwords for a fee? If not, seems like you're in the minority, acccording to research.
- Macs under attack?
- Intel: security inside
- Are you spending too much on IT security?
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Eurocrats versus the cyber criminals
- The truth about spam
- Google and privacy: What’s the problem?
- Q&A: Symantec’s CISO on the source code hack
- RSA: Back from the breach?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Google Issue ?
Surely the onus is on the owner of the WiFi network to secure it?
By Fractalus on Tuesday Jun 15