ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    Q&A: George Kurtz, CTO, McAfee

We met with the chief technology officer (CTO) of McAfee, the largest dedicated security vendor, to discuss the growing information security threats facing business, and how IT professionals can respond.

By Stephen Pritchard, 30 Jun 2010 at 11:54

George Kurtz, McAfee

There is always a balance to be struck in IT between being the department that provides security, and the department that always says “no”. How do you tread that line?

If you think about the consumerisation of IT, IT departments can no longer say no. If you have an iPad, an iPhone, or an Android [device] and want to bring it in, you will do it. What we’ve found is the IT departments that say no, people will still bring the devices in and people will start forwarding their work mail to their personal accounts, and read it there.

We have to embrace consumerisation as these devices are more powerful than some enterprise devices. So the question is how do you secure them and how do you enable them? We are focusing on being able to manage and provide security policies on all these devices, whether it’s an iPhone, a slate or Windows Mobile. We bought Trust Digital to help organisations to manage these devices.

All IT budgets are under pressure. How do chief information security officers defend their corner, and ensure that if they do make cuts, it doesn’t create new vulnerabilities?

One of the most important things is having meaningful metrics. That is lacking in the security world. There is really no way to see how company A compares to company B, in security terms, and in terms of how much money they are spending.

What we see is fairly useless metrics – how many hits on our IDS how many viruses. From a CSO's perspective they need to be able to put real metrics into to business terms. Putting it into business terms allows you to articulate the value. This is the security paradox: the more nothing happens, the more secure you are.

You need metrics that can show how you reduced risk and support the business. They can’t put it in terms that a business person doesn’t understand: viruses, registry entries and all kinds of gobbledygook.

A business person cares about time, money, and not going to jail because of a regulatory requirement.

If chief security officers can put it in those terms they have a much better chance of being able to pursue their agenda, and reduce risk from a business perspective.

1 2 3
Next

Email to a friend

Print this page

< Previous   Security : Analysis & Insight Next >

Be the first to comment on this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

    You may also like...

 Sponsored Links

advertisement

    You may also like...

    Latest Security Tutorials

PC on a drip (virus protection)

How to protect a group of office PCs from viruses

Safeguarding multiple office computers from malware doesn't have to be difficult or expensive, as Simon Edwards shows in our step-by-step guide.

Read more

 
advertisement

    Latest Analysis & Insight Videos in Security

Why security should top the cloud agenda

Play Why security should top the cloud agenda   Play

Security should always be paramount in business, but with a cloud based infrastructure it’s arguably even more important. Steve Cassidy and...

 
Sponsored Links
Advertisement