Google given all clear over Wi-Fi affair
By Martin James,
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has completed its investigation into the private data captured by Google's Street View mapping cars, concluding the information did not amount to “meaningful personal details”.
Under fire in May after its fleet of Street View cars were found to be soaking up data from unprotected Wi-Fi networks in as many as 30 countries in 2006, Google has found itself fighting off investigations on several fronts, including the UK and a multi-state probe in the US.
For its part, however, the UK's ICO has declared in a statement it found “no evidence as yet that the data captured by Google has caused or could cause any individual detriment.”
“The information we saw does not include meaningful personal details that could be linked to an identifiable person,” the statement read.
“As we have only seen samples of the records collected in the UK we recognise that other data protection authorities conducting a detailed analysis of all the payload data collected in their jurisdictions may nevertheless find samples of information which can be linked to identifiable individuals.”
“However, on the basis of the samples we saw we are satisfied so far that it is unlikely that Google will have captured significant amounts of personal data.”
The information watchdog said it would be notifying Privacy International and other relevant parties of its position.
Speaking to the Guardian, however, Big Brother Watch director Alex Deane called the outcome “farcical”.
“Information commissioners all around the world are investigating Google's Wi-Fi intrusion,” Deane said. “In Britain alone, our commissioner has whitewashed the company's wrongdoing.
“The Metropolitan Police are currently investigating Google over this very issue. If the allegations against Google merit an investigation by the police, who have to consider the criminal standard of fault, how can those allegations not be said to merit an investigation by the ICO?”
He concluded: “The ICO has really let British people down. We deserve better from those who are given the responsibility of protecting our privacy."
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Security Analysis & Insight
Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
Davey Winder questions what data was stolen from VeriSign and wonders why the company hasn't been more forthcoming.
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- Would you employ a hacker or malware writer?
- Q&A: Raj Samani, CTO McAfee
- Erase and rewind: the EU and privacy
- My email address is [CENSORED]
- Is there such a thing as a secure tablet?
- 2011: The year in news
- BYOD: Old or new, good or bad?
- Are the cookie laws crumbling already?
Latest Security Reviews
Check Point 2210 Appliance review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Will someone rid me of these troublesome Macs?
- BT considering Ofcom price cap appeal
- Google sends in Bouncer to sort out malicious apps
- Anonymous publishes FBI hacking call
- ACTA: the basics, the controversies, and the future
- Virgin 100Mbps rollout 'ahead of schedule'
- Who to trust after the VeriSign hack?
- Head to Head: Mac OS X 10.7 Lion vs Windows 7
- VeriSign admits 2010 hack
- What should RIM do to recapture the attention of businesses?
Latest News Videos in Security
IT PRO Podcast: Are UK data protection laws flawed?
We bring in two experts to talk about the problems with UK data protection law and the way it is managed.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

![My email address is [CENSORED]](http://cdn.itpro.co.uk/images/front_picture_library_IT_Pro/dir_227/it_photo_113980_36.jpg)



