ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    Flash prices set to plunge?

Will solid state now replace hard disks?

By Eric Doyle, 20 Aug 2010 at 14:36

Falling prices sign

The price of NAND memory is expected to almost halve to a dollar (£0.65) a gigabyte in the new year, according to research firm iSuppli.

Flash memory currently costs around $1.80 (£1.16) per gigabyte and, if the prediction holds out, it will

mean two-year low for NAND chips. About a year ago the price was over the $2 mark.

In 2008, the low price for memory gave rise to a rumour that solid-state drives (SSDs) would soon be competitive with hard disk drives (HDDs). Michael Yang, a senior analyst at iSuppli, said that he does not believe that the drop in price will rekindle this rumour.

“Traditional HDDs gained a lot of additional ground during the past few years in terms of rising capacity and falling prices,” he said. “In fact, HDDs have gained so much ground that SSDs now are in danger of never regaining their competitive footing.”

He thinks that triple level cell (TLC) flash chips would have to drop to 40 cents per gigabyte by 2012 to stand any chance of competing. At that price a packaged 100Gbyte SSD would cost around $50 (£32).

Higher demand is usually followed by shortage of supply in the memory market. Yang is confident this will not be the case and he said that supply is sufficiently ahead of demand.

The recent announcement from Intel and Micron Technology of a higher density NAND chip could hold the key to a further drop in the price. The smaller form factor would also make it easier to increase the capacity of fixed-format SD memory cards.

Email to a friend

Print this page

< Previous   SSDs : News Next >

2 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

People will pay for more speed

SSDs are much faster than HDDs, many are willing to pay a little more for improved performance. Of course, right now you pay a lot more and sacrifice capacity - but narrow that gap and SSDs' popularity will really take off. Anyway, the one doesn't have to replace the other; you can use a SSD for your system drive, HDDs for data, get the best of both worlds.

By greenknight32 on Tuesday Aug 24

8 people out of 8 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Prices falling?

In 1996, when I bought my first Mac, (which had 16Mb of memory installed) I bought an extra 64Mb for £934.16 - how much is that per Gb?

By coldstream on Tuesday Nov 2

0 people out of 0 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

    You may also like...

 Sponsored Links

advertisement

    You may also like...

    Latest SSDs Analysis & Insight

Michael Dell

Michael Dell: Back from the brink?

In late 2010, Michael Dell didn't have the full confidence of shareholders. Has he turned things around over the past year?

Read more

 
advertisement

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement