Apple could foil iPhone jailbreakers with new patent
By Jennifer Scott,
In its latest patent bid, Apple has revealed it could close down jailbroken iPhones with new technology.
The purpose of the patent, published online last week, is to “identify unauthorised users of an electronic device” and either notify the genuine owner or stop the device from working.
However, as well as protecting users if their handset is stolen, the patent specifically mentions jailbreaking as a way of recognising an unauthorised user, meaning the company could restrict access to an iPhone if this act was carried out.
“In some embodiments, an unauthorised user can be detected by noting particular activities that can indicate suspicious behaviour,” read the patent.
“For example, activities such as entering an incorrect password a predetermined number of times in a row, hacking of the electronic device, jailbreaking of the electronic device, removing a SIM card from the electronic device, or moving a predetermined distance away from a synced device can be used to detect an unauthorised user.”
Some more unusual techniques have been included to ensure the person using the phone is the rightful owner. Along with face and voice recognition, the patent included the ability to record and compare heartbeats.
“The heartbeat of the current user can be taken… [and] can be compared, respectively, to a… heartbeat of authorised users of the electronic device to determine whether they match,” the patent read.
Once an unauthorised user is detected, Apple will be able to send what it claimed was a “subtle” notification via email, voicemail or text message to the owner and restrict access to the phone if necessary.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Mobile Analysis & Insight
Citrix takes on the mobile cloud at Synergy
Citrix’s annual gathering saw numerous product announcements clustered around the dual themes of mobility and cloud
- Bring you own device: the $600 question
- Shanghai surprise: Counterfeit technology in China
- 4G edges closer
- Apple's new iPad doesn't give users a choice
- Government IT: Apples for the mandarins
- Mobile comms: coffee and TV
- Rolling out iPads in the enterprise
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
- What should RIM do to recapture the attention of businesses?
Latest Mobile Reviews
Amazon Kindle Touch review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Latest News Videos in Mobile
IT PRO Podcast: CES 2011
In the first podcast of 2011, we talk with Adam Griffin of Dell and Barry Collins of PCPro about tablets, the cloud and all the other exciting...
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Who does my phone belong to?
I agree that Apple has a responsibility to safeguard their marketplace and technologies, but it is fundamentally wrong for users to be 'punished' for altering their hardware which they have paid good money for. Some clarity is needed at the point of sale - when I buy an iPhone, is it mine do do as I wish? Once I have paid my money, I can throw it in the sea, dismantle it, in fact do just about anything to it without any comeback - it is mine to do so. OK, I understand well enough that I can't copy any software that is on the iPhone, apps or system firmware because that is breach of copyright. Jailbreaking is another thing altogether, it allows users to obtain legitimate software elsewhere other than the iTunes store. If, in the process that screws up a few functions on the phone then that's the penalty a user must accept before jailbreaking but beyond that there shouldn't be a legal problem. I suspect that jailbreaking is not the problem Apple thinks it is either - I had an original iPhone and 'jailbroke' it but it wasn't too long before I reverted back to the phone as standard - you had to wait for the next jailbreak when new iPhone OS software was available and you remain one step behind and not entirely bug free either. Apple should concentrate on making their offering so good that no one will want to jailbreak their iPhone.
Steve
By willacyman on Tuesday Aug 24