European firms wasting millions on unused apps
By Tom Brewster,
Some 80 per cent of IT professionals in Europe believe their companies are hosting unused applications and data, costing them time and money.
In some cases, the research commissioned by Informatica discovered the cost of keeping such applications in house was estimated to cost the business over €2 million (£1.75 million) per year.
Three-quarters of respondents said their companies were storing applications that had not been used in three years.
Furthermore, almost 90 per cent of the 600 professionals polled by Dynamic Markets said systems would run more efficiently if the unused applications were deleted.
“Companies must control their data, not the other way around,” said Mark Seager, vice president of technology for Informatica in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA).
“Through chaotic and inconsistent approaches to how data is managed across the enterprise, companies increasingly have to ‘mind the data gap’. This has an obvious impact on businesses’ ability to utilise what is arguably their most valued asset.”
Some firms appeared unwilling to let applications go, with almost half of respondents saying their firm would not remove the apps or their databases in case they were needed at some point in the future.
“Although almost a third of IT professionals don’t feel that there is any benefit to removing unused databases from the system, this is not the case,” Seager added.
“By cluttering up the network they’re acting as a road block and leading to wasteful spending on something that is never going to deliver any tangible business value.”
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Strategy Analysis & Insight
HP: it's all about the software, stupid
The hardware giant is to restructure again, at the cost of 27,000 jobs. But it is the vendor's software strategy that is now being questioned.
- CIO: Career is over?
- Windows Azure VM Beta for AWS users (and cloud virgins)
- Citrix takes on the mobile cloud at Synergy
- Bring you own device: the $600 question
- Getting ready for EMC World
- HP to bring indestructible plastic displays and Memristor storage to market
- Montreux Jazz Festival: Storage in a different light
- Interop 2012: Q&A, Saar Gillai, CTO, HP Networking
- There's more to IP than taming pirates
Latest Strategy Reviews
ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- Office 365 review: First look
- Novell ZENworks Configuration Management 11 Standard Edition review
- Mindjet MindManager 9 review
- Tableau Desktop Professional Edition review
- Spiceworks review
- Head to Head: Parallels Desktop 6 vs VMware Fusion 3
- Swiftlight review
- FaceTime Communications USG-1030 review
- Top 10 iPad apps for business review
advertisement
Most popular
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- ICO: Fines for cookie law breakers
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Open source software driving cloud-based innovation
- Fujitsu targets enterprises with Android ICS tablet
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Dell PowerEdge R820 review
- BlackBerry 7 OS certified to carry 'Restricted' UK government information
Latest News Videos in Strategy
Q&A: David Elton, PA Consulting Group
CIOs are increasingly influential, but have to juggle "dual roles", study finds.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Naturally - If It Works...
As is so often the case, these people are acting in a way that is intuitive.
While one might think them Luddites, it may just be that their approach is the right one;
http://www.elektor.com/news/wonder-why-we-don-t-crash-like-computers-yale.1353484.lynkx?utm_source=UK&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news
Especially as systems become ever more complex, might it not be more useful to think of ways that we can accommodate more redundancy, not less. Where licensing is not an issue, I find it much more preferable to retain an application rather than remove it, because the touted effectiveness of subsequently developed conversion software is often not as good as advertised. The original application will still, in most cases work on a modern PC.
By Auracious on Friday Oct 15