ITPRO

Printed from www.itpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.itpro.co.uk/reg/register.

The newsletter contains links to our latest IT news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Skip to navigation

    BT slams Virgin 100Mbps broadband pricing

BT criticises Virgin's "premium" pricing for the 100Mbps announced this week.

By Tom Brewster, 28 Oct 2010 at 13:33

Money

BT has questioned why Virgin Media’s 100Mbps upcoming broadband service has been priced so highly, given the current economic climate.

BT said all superfast broadband is positive for the UK, but the communications giant was bemused as to why Virgin is planning to charge such “premium” prices.

Virgin Media’s 100Mbps broadband service will cost £45 per month as a stand-alone service or £35 when bundled with a phone line.

“Take up is as important as availability … and so we would question why Virgin are charging such a premium,” a BT statement sent to IT PRO said.

“Their new service is more than twice the price of BT's fibre product and so we are surprised by the high price when most family budgets are tight.”

While BT’s prices may be lower, it currently only offers 40Mbps speeds and will not achieve 100Mbps or faster until next year.

Furthermore, Virgin offers a 50Mbps service from £28 a month, although the BT Infinity 40Mbps package can be bought for as low as £19.99.

BT, which agreed with Ofcom earlier this year to share its fibre networks with rivals, also noted Virgin’s network is not “open to other companies in the way BT's is.”

The company said it was happy to have the extra competition in the market, however.

“BT is already rolling out fibre broadband to approximately 17 million homes and businesses and it is good for UK plc that there will be another high speed network,” it added.

Further to yesterday's announcement, Virgin said around 12.7 million homes will get the new 100Mbps service when roll out is complete, which is expected to be in 2012.

Phil Smith, chief executive (CEO) of Cisco UK & Ireland, was more positive about the introduction of Virgin’s services.

He said the announcement “is a clear sign that we are moving in the right direction by investing in the high quality, superfast networks that will be needed for us to join the 14 countries whose networks are already prepared for the applications of the future.”

“It’s important that the focus is on improving the UK’s network overall and this is a great step forward but much more investment is needed to make the UK more competitive and connected,” Smith added.

Email to a friend

Print this page

< Previous   Broadband : News Next >

11 comments

You need to Login or Register to comment.

Not so overpriced.

I can well remember paying £50.00 per month, for 500k from BT, or one of its preferred co-providers :-)

By Charles_Smyth on Thursday Oct 28

17 people out of 20 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Pardon???

Errr, I'm sorry, BT are saying this??
We currently pay nearly £30 a month for our "broadband" from BT, in addition to line rental and their ridiculous call charges, and we get 2MBPS!!! - I think I would gladly pay an extra fiver to have 100MBPS!!!!! would you not?? Not to mention that BTs 'unlimited' "broadband" then gets capped if we download over 100gb a month, and we regularly have to spend HOURS at a time on the phone to them to get them to fix THEIR OWN Mistakes, which they try and make us PAY FOR and then they'll 'reimburse us next month' - for completely erroneous charges!! Then when we had a conversation with a manager on the phone he didn't even leave any notes about it and the whole debacle started again and our line and internet was CUT OFF!! - There are numerous things I consider BT to stand for now but it's nothing to do with communications I can assure you, Next chance I get (When I move house) I am switching to virgin as it seems they're actually interested in increasing their capability and doing it for a reasonable price!!!

By scichosis on Thursday Oct 28

25 people out of 31 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Certainly over priced

My current ISP, Velocity 1, in Bournemouth currently charges £19.99 per month for up 100 Mbs with unlimited downloads, and usually it is at 30 Mbs/sec. This is in direct contrast to a small business which pays £17.50 a month for BTs offering of up to 20 Mbs/sec, per month, with 5 Gb limit, having to pay more for exeeding this bandwidth.. It usually runs at between 5-17 Mbs/sec a month.

By Ip_itsupport108f on Friday Oct 29

0 people out of 3 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Dial-up 56K.

10-12 years ago, before broadband was readily available, it was normal to pay £50-60 per month, when using a 56K dial-up modem, at 1p per minute. And it took 3-minutes to download 1Mb. Since that time, and factoring in the depreciating purchasing power of money, Virgin's £45.00 per month, for 100Mb, is about 4,000 times better value for money.

By Charles_Smyth on Friday Oct 29

5 people out of 5 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

And the rest of us

And the rest of us are stuck with crap speeds, I'm surrounded by cable enabled properties but I have to have a BT copper line because the government won't allow cable companies to lay any more pipes to keep BT viable. I'm paying twice the cost of cable for a tenth the speed.

By dfruk on Friday Oct 29

3 people out of 5 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

BT versus Virgin

I have two 100Mbps business lines. One from BT and one from Virgin. It's a long story! Okay, not domestic lines BUT you mightbe intersted to hear that both companies are woefull in their performance at this level. Of the two, Virgin is by far the worst. I speak to support / technical people on a monthly basis. Virgin are poor.

By pjackson on Saturday Oct 30

2 people out of 6 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

It's Virgin

Since Virgin took control of all the cable companies the packages have been rising in line with Sky but without the amount of channels on offer the only thing in their favour was well priced broadband which is no longer the case. I used to be a Virgin customer but when I moved they could not give me cable services and their phone line broadband was expensive and useless, this is despite being surrounded on all sides by cable . I didn't want Sky as I hate the lying crook of an owner. So I'm stuck with freeview and freesat and thank god for Channel 5, although Sky have stopped Fiver And Five USA from going on freesat, Whats the point of HD when theres only 2 channels.

By dfruk on Friday Dec 10

2 people out of 2 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

Villages still ignored

I've been on 576kb/s for years, still paying the same as those who get 2mbp/s, pretty poor.
I wonder if I ever get a decent speed, will I get discount for all the years over-paying for an under-speed connection ;-)

By HeliEye on Friday Jan 14

1 people out of 2 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

BT's not all bad ...

I was an early adopter, and have had reasonable service from BT over the years IMHO. I'm clearly not too far from the BT exchange and I currently get 8Mbps.

I have long thought that folk should protest about poor speeds however, insisting they pay "up to" the amount requested for "up to" the speeds offered - pro-rata.

I'm also an advocate of insisting speeds be quoted as the maximum permissable 24/7 without breaching the (un)fair use policy associated with each offering. Here again, I'm reasonably satisfied with 300GB/month meaning my "fair" 24/7 speed is around 115Kbps in a 30 day month.

I'd sure like all suppliers to quote THAT figure ...

Russ

By RussTheMan on Wednesday Feb 9

2 people out of 2 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

BT's not all bad ...

I was an early adopter, and have had reasonable service from BT over the years IMHO. I'm clearly not too far from the BT exchange and I currently get 8Mbps.

I have long thought that folk should protest about poor speeds however, insisting they pay "up to" the amount requested for "up to" the speeds offered - pro-rata.

I'm also an advocate of insisting speeds be quoted as the maximum permissable 24/7 without breaching the (un)fair use policy associated with each offering. Here again, I'm reasonably satisfied with 300GB/month meaning my "fair" 24/7 speed is around 115Kbps in a 30 day month.

I'd sure like all suppliers to quote THAT figure ...

Russ

By RussTheMan on Wednesday Feb 9

1 people out of 1 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

madfforit

100mb download 10mb upload and no cap and adsl isnt even considered broadband under the international definition of what broadband is and when it was reclassified in this country isdn is now considered broadband

By maddforit on Wednesday Sep 21

0 people out of 0 found this comment useful.

Did you find it useful?

    You may also like...

 Sponsored Links

advertisement

    You may also like...

advertisement

    Latest News Videos in Broadband

Video: Q&A with Virgin Media Business’ Mark Heraghty

Play Video: Q&A with Virgin Media Business’ Mark Heraghty   Play

We talk British broadband with the managing director of Virgin Media’s business division.

 

    Register for IT PRO

You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.

Sponsored Links
Advertisement