Vaizey favours ISP-run two-tier internet
By Jennifer Scott,
The Government “should do all they can” to avoid regulation of the internet, according to one of its senior ministers, but still allow ISPs to charge for speedier delivery of sites.
Ed Vaizey, Conservative MP and communications minister, claimed the Coalition should help the internet remain open and transparent and all legal content should be viewable by the general public.
However, he still believed ISPs should be allowed to manage their networks and charge content providers and users for faster access.
In a speech at the FT World Telecoms Conference, Vaizey said the current internet model had allowed for an “unprecedented level of innovation,” allowing for huge companies to emerge and make millions of dollars.
“This is a model that the British government wishes to protect,” he added. “A lightly regulated internet is good for business, good for the economy, and good for people.”
However, campaigners for “net neutrality” have hit back at the suggestion, backed by telecoms regulator Ofcom and the European Commission.
"Removing 'net neutrality' is likely to reduce innovation and reduce people's ability to exercise their freedom of speech,” said Jim Killock, executive director of the Open Rights Group (ORG).
"ORG will campaign against any market abuse, if companies like BT, Sky and Virgin restrict customer's internet access for market advantage."
However, Vaizey concluded: "The government is no fan of regulation and we should only intervene when it is clearly necessary to deliver important benefits for consumers."
Sponsored Links
advertisement
Latest Email Delivery Analysis & Insight
Which mobile platform is best for business?
With three main smartphone platforms taking up the lion’s share of business communications, it can sometimes be hard to decide which is best for you business.
Latest Email Delivery Reviews
Fujitsu ScanSnap N1800 review
Rating: ![]()
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.



two-tier speed Internet
Not sure what the problem is with this concept. The Net is already two speed. Private users pay for 50:1 contention, Business (and some gamers) pay extra for for 20:1 contention. You cant expect the ISPs to put n x 6MB/s into every area on the off chance everyone will be on at the same time. Whilst I have 6MB/s some of the time I can tell when the school children come home the net here in West Sussex slows down noticeably. Same at weekends, get on there before they get up! If you are on a 3G Dongle then you really rely on a quiet time to get a service at all. If the number of users go up then the service area shrinks and you are left in limbo waiting for the dongle to decide if it is switching over to 2G or not!!
Bob
By repcomms on Friday Nov 19
Thats not two-tier Bob
Thats not what two-tier means. And neither does your example, even when contention ratios did exist.
Two-tier means allowing ISPs to charge commercial companies greater rates to give priority to *their* traffic, to the detriment of other traffic. But that isnt all, either. Net neutrality also means that the Internet has no restriction by govt or ISP, in terms of content, sites, platforms, etc. The main problem that net-neutrality advocates face is public apathy, and misinformation.
By alewis on Friday Nov 19
Two Tier is paying for priority delivery
If Ofcom and the European Commission support two tier then beware it will be bad for every user. Ofcom is no friend of the consumer who they are supposed to protect. The EU Conmissioners are answerable to no one
By snowtop on Saturday Nov 20