DWP IT fails add to administrative mistakes
By Tom Brewster,
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has been advised to improve its IT systems to help reduce the cost of administrative errors in the benefit system.
A report by the National Audit Office (NAO) found that due to DWP processing errors, in 2009-10 the department overpaid an estimated £1.1 billion and made underpayments of £500 million.
One major issue cited by department staff was the use of different computer systems to process benefits. In NAO interviews with workers, they claimed the different systems did not communicate well with each other.
In its audit, the NAO said many of the computer systems at the department were “relatively old and standalone.” This meant they were difficult to update and data was not readily accessible between the different systems.
“The department continues to work on system ‘fixes’ but until it is able to develop a solution to enable integration of its processing systems, the overall impact on administrative errors is likely to be limited,” the report read.
Amyas Morse, head of the NAO, said the department clearly wanted to make improvements and cut out mistakes but no real ground had been made.
“The department is clearly committed to reducing the cost of administrative error and it is frustrating that there has been no discernible reduction since 2007,” Morse added.
“Progress will depend on developing a better understanding of the costs and benefits of different interventions, so that they can be targeted more effectively and are able to achieve a significant reduction in the cost of administrative error.”
The Information Commissioner’s Office recently warned the DWP to be careful not to breach data protection laws when using credit reference agency reports in assessing benefit claims.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Public Sector Analysis & Insight
The Digital Economy Act: Is it doomed to never happen?
As a further delay hits part of the implementation of the Digital Economy Act, is this just a small hiccup, or is the Act being rendered toothless already? Simon Brew takes a look.
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Q&A: Rajeeb Dey, CEO Enternships
- Government IT: Apples for the mandarins
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- 2011: The year in news
- Are the cookie laws crumbling already?
- UK rural broadband: too little, and too late
- How the Data Protection Act's death will punish the UK economy
- Education: glad to be a geek
Latest Public Sector Reviews
HTC Flyer review: First Look
- HP TouchPad review: First Look
- RIM BlackBerry PlayBook review - First Look
- MWC 2011: Acer Iconia A100 and A500 reviews – first look videos
- MWC 2011: HP TouchPad review - first look video
- MWC 2011: RIM BlackBerry PlayBook review - first look video
- MWC 2011: HP Pre3 review - first look video
- MWC 2011: Motorola Pro review - first look video
- MWC 2011: HTC Flyer tablet review - first look video
- MWC 2011: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 review – first look video
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Latest News Videos in Public Sector
Q&A: David Elton, PA Consulting Group
CIOs are increasingly influential, but have to juggle "dual roles", study finds.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






RE:
The government needs to change its siloed approach to information if erroneous records are to be abolished so payments are only made to Britain’s most vulnerable citizens. Insightful understanding of an individual is only possible if their records are cross-checked and seamlessly integrated. This ensures inconsistent claims can be pinpointed before they pollute the wider government network, stopping unnecessary payments immediately and eliminating error from the system. Without this action, incidences of wasted public money will continue to hit the headlines and little will actually change.
By GrahamKempSASUK on Thursday Nov 25