Government reiterates plans for ‘best broadband’ by 2015
By Jennifer Scott,
The UK is still on track for the best broadband in Europe by 2015, claimed the Government minister responsible for the pledge.
Jeremy Hunt, minister for culture, media and sport, is today unveiling plans – albeit similar to pledges made earlier this year – for everyone in the UK to have a minimum of 2Mbps connections by 2015.
This is a much longer period than was set out by the previous Government – which pledged 2Mbps for all by 2012 – but Hunt claimed the money to fund such a scheme wasn’t there when he came into power.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “When I arrived in office, one of the first things that the officials told me was that there was only half the money necessary to deliver on that 2012 target.”
“They had allocated £230 million to this project. That has now gone up to £830 million.”
The extra money will come from the TV licence pot, which had spare cash left over from the Digital Switchover campaign.
As well as creating digital hubs to help get fibre to even the most rural of communities, £50 million of the fund will go towards trialling new methods to roll out broadband.
The key to achieving the 2015 target, however, was still to garner investment from the private sector.
“I think the Government has a very important role to catalyse investment by the private sector,” said Hunt.
“If you look at countries like Korea, which has probably the best super fast broadband network in the world, 90 per cent of the investment came from the private sector and just 10 per cent from the Government.”
He concluded: “What we have to do is use the very limited funds that we have available in the current climate to really stimulate as much investment as possible by the private sector.”
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Networking Analysis & Insight
Bring you own device: the $600 question
Inside the enterprise: A recent Cisco report claims bring your own device is gaining support from IT departments. But how much are staff willing to invest in personal technology?
- Interop 2012: Q&A, Saar Gillai, CTO, HP Networking
- Is BT the key to broadband Britain?
- Tencent: the biggest web company you’ve never heard of
- The truth about spam
- Have ISPs finally lost the DEA fight?
- Are you ready to launch IPv6 securely?
- Broadband, pricing and small businesses
- Welcome to the stay-at-home Olympics
- Q&A: Cisco on servers, storage and strategy
Latest Networking Reviews
HP t410 All-in-One Thin Client review: First look
- Swyx SwyxExpress X20 review
- Ipswitch WhatsUp Gold Premium 15
- ForeScout Technologies CounterACT 6.3.4
- ThinPrint Printer Dashboard review: First Look
- TITUS Aware for Microsoft Outlook review
- Windows Phone 7 Mango review: First Look
- Dartware InterMapper review
- Kemp Technologies LoadMaster 3600 review
- Sangfor WANACC M5500 review
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Rural users need it first...
If FTTC or wireless solutions are to be implemented, let's see them in rural areas first as there are significantly poorer speeds and little or no competition.
Cities and even smaller towns (such as Middlewich, Cheshire or Bagshot, Surrey) have FTTC because BT has chosen to compete with O2 / Be and Sky offerings, and no doubt wherever Virgin cable is installed, BT will push FTTC.
Meanwhile many market towns (and more rural locations) with neither Sky nor O2, and no chance of cable are left in the slow lane and forgotten about.
Businesses, tourism and working from home would be enhanced/made possible, reducing traffic to/from cities as an added benefit.
By NetworkGuy on Tuesday Dec 7
broad band
Hands off the TV licence fee. This is for producing good programmes. Thepeople who pay for this should be those who will profit from it, I. E. the telecom companies such as BT. I agree with the other post. More should be spent on rural areas where speeds are abysmal.
By Birdmaniw on Tuesday Dec 7
They should be
They should be jumping on the ISPs who sell you unlimited but then hit you with excess charges if you go over their fair use policy, which they don't mention till you exceed it. It's stupid quoting Korea, we don't have people who will dig trenches for 2 bags of rice a week, sorry I forgot that's Camerons next move, people in wheelchairs swinging pickaxes while the people he made unemployed use the shovels.
By dfruk on Tuesday Dec 7