EC to pay €12 million over copyright breach
By Tom Brewster,
The European Commission (EC) has been told to pay over €12 million (£10.2 million) to software provider Systran for breaching copyright laws.
Systran provided the EC with UNIX-based translation software between 1997 and 2002. The European body brought about legal action by Systran after it launched a tender for maintenance in 2003, asking other companies to upgrade the translation systems.
The software provider claimed the EC had impinged on the company’s intellectual property rights by allowing other firms to work on its translation software.
The case has come to a close after almost four years of legal wrangling and Systran claimed the EU General Court's decision was an historic one.
“Following ten years of fighting and a court proceeding lasting nearly four years, the General Court of the European Union has recognised Systran's intellectual property rights,” Systran said in a statement.
“For the first time, a European institution has been condemned in such a manner and to such a degree.”
The court also warned if Systran’s IP rights are not better protected in future, the software firm could sue the commission yet again.
“It is for the Commission to draw all appropriate conclusions in order to ensure that Systran's rights in the Systran Unix version are taken into account as concerns the work relating to the EC-Systran Unix version,” the court said.
“If they are not taken into account, given that the damage for which compensation is awarded in this case holds only for the period from 2004 to the date of delivery of this judgment, Systran would be entitled to bring before the General Court a fresh action seeking damages in respect of the further damage it might suffer."
In the UK, a debate surrounding IP laws is rumbling on. Last week, a call for evidence was launched in order to assess whether legislation in the country has hindered businesses in the digital age.
You may also like...
Sponsored Links
advertisement
You may also like...
Latest Public Sector Analysis & Insight
The Digital Economy Act: Is it doomed to never happen?
As a further delay hits part of the implementation of the Digital Economy Act, is this just a small hiccup, or is the Act being rendered toothless already? Simon Brew takes a look.
- Does the government want to snoop on your data?
- Q&A: Rajeeb Dey, CEO Enternships
- Government IT: Apples for the mandarins
- Striving to solve the security skills crisis
- 2011: The year in news
- Are the cookie laws crumbling already?
- UK rural broadband: too little, and too late
- How the Data Protection Act's death will punish the UK economy
- Education: glad to be a geek
Latest Public Sector Reviews
HTC Flyer review: First Look
- HP TouchPad review: First Look
- RIM BlackBerry PlayBook review - First Look
- MWC 2011: Acer Iconia A100 and A500 reviews – first look videos
- MWC 2011: HP TouchPad review - first look video
- MWC 2011: RIM BlackBerry PlayBook review - first look video
- MWC 2011: HP Pre3 review - first look video
- MWC 2011: Motorola Pro review - first look video
- MWC 2011: HTC Flyer tablet review - first look video
- MWC 2011: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 review – first look video
advertisement
Most popular
- UK regulator shuts down Angry Birds scam
- Apple iPad 3 vs iPad 2 head-to-head review
- IBM bans use of Siri on iPhones
- Chromebooks: What's gone wrong?
- HP plans massive job cuts
- EMC World 2012: Tucci declares Documentum is here to stay
- Dell EqualLogic PS6100XS review
- Macs and Android under malware threat
- RIM loses its head of sales
- Local fibre broadband needs common standards
Latest News Videos in Public Sector
Q&A: David Elton, PA Consulting Group
CIOs are increasingly influential, but have to juggle "dual roles", study finds.
Register for IT PRO
You'll get exclusive member benefits including free whitepapers, downloads, Webinars and weekly newsletters full of the latest IT PRO news, reviews, insight and expertise.






Software maintenance?
So that's it? The ultimate software vendor lock-in? Enshrined in EU law...
That judgement is BEYOND ridiculous - if anything is replaced the IP is no longer the originator's and if it isn't changed then no harm has been done. This is all about being uncompetitive tendering for software maintenance and guess who pays for that now?
By Ip_Richard541178 on Tuesday Dec 21